Re: Geomagnetic poles--an explanation.

John Berry ( antigrav@ihug.co.nz )
Thu, 21 Oct 1999 14:00:27 +1300

I understand what you are saying, but the point is that this is all patently silly.
It's not hidden information, you don't need to be a guru.
You just need to know the way it is.
And if you want proof, then get a coil of wire and let it be the judge, there are plenty
of sources that tell you the poles of an electromagnet, and forgive me for not searching
for any URL's to verify but if you are looking at a coil head on and the electrons are
circling in a clockwise direction then you are facing the north pole of the coil.

That should be all the proof needed, anyway I could use a reference yet it would seem
foolish as a reference showing the poles of the earth the way I am saying they are was
already shown by someone trying to prove the opposite, and further more there are URL's
and websites that show it the other way round too, so URL's don't cut it, text references
are fine, but are unlikely to be able to be looked up.

Anyway though I find you "Prove it with URL's" thing annoying I do apperciate it...

"Jerry W. Decker" wrote:

> John,
>
> It's not an argument, its a matter of credibility and CONFIDENCE in what
> people say KNOWING that it is knowledge that has been determined and
> agreed upon by many others as proven by the URLs or definitions.
>
> I have always detested it when people set themselves up as some kind of
> guru or possessing hidden information which can only be gleaned by
> following or sucking up, the net is replete with such characters,
> usually hawaking their products or insights...it is a cultish mentality
> and the ones who are countenanced, usually shrink away while screaming
> suppression or other such insanities. I have no time or patience with
> such people.
>
> This website has always been completely open with anything we had that
> might be of use freely posted and the intent from inception was to
> attract LIKE MINDED AND ACTING PEOPLE.
>
> On the BBS I had levels assigned by degree of participation and
> cooperation to help others or offering useful information, insight or
> suggestions, but its difficult to do on the net to filter out those who
> had their own motives or agendas, thus this discussion list.
>
> On the BBS people often removed excerpts from relevant material to
> backup or enhance their points...on the net, that can still be done,
> though often URLs provide that backup.
>
> So when someone quotes opinion thats fine, but when someone quotes what
> they claim is fact....and it is contentitious or a questionable
> statement, be prepared to prove it.
>
> If there are no other posted details that backup this socalled fact,
> then provide an experiment where others can prove it, otherwise, express
> it as OPINION, NOT FACT....
>
> John Berry wrote:
> >
> > Let's not get into the argument of URL's as verification.
> > The point is that both of us are saying the same thing anyway, It is not complex of
> > difficult just confusing if you don't know what you are talking about.
> >
> --
> Jerry Wayne Decker - jdecker@keelynet.com
> http://www.keelynet.com
> from an Art to a Science
> Voice : (214)324-8741 - FAX : (214)324-3501
> KeelyNet - PO BOX 870716
> Mesquite - Republic of Texas - 75187
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------
> To leave this list, email <listserver@keelynet.com>
> with the body text: leave Interact
> list archives and on line subscription forms are at
> http://keelynet.com/interact/
> -------------------------------------------------------------

-------------------------------------------------------------
To leave this list, email <listserver@keelynet.com>
with the body text: leave Interact
list archives and on line subscription forms are at
http://keelynet.com/interact/
-------------------------------------------------------------