That is why I asked, if you realy meant photon, rather than light, or EM radiation.
Actually it seems that the hell is breaking loose. There is a new experiment which
can be interpreted in rather interesting manner.
URL: http://www.bestweb.net/~sansbury/PockelsExperiment.pdf
It may corellate with that Hertz experiment I posted probably in this line. I did
not have time to really go through it yet. Just skipped through.
I am posting this, because I think it will interest more of us.
Regards Slavek.
John Berry wrote:
> Light isn't made out of photons? Or maybe you are taking the narrow view that
> light has to be visible and so photons that are not within the visible range are
> not light photons?
>
> Slavek Krepelka wrote:
>
> > Hello Ken at all.
> >
> > I have been flamed for the statment of this so many times that I think that I
> > must be fireproof or something.
> > Ken, can you please confirm that you meant photon by the word photon and not
> > light?
> >
> > Thanks Slavek.
> >
> > Carrigan, Ken wrote:
> >
> > > Both showed that a photon has properties
> > > of mass, and also of a wave.
> >
> > -------------------------------------------------------------
> > To leave this list, email <listserver@keelynet.com>
> > with the body text: leave Interact
> > list archives and on line subscription forms are at
> > http://keelynet.com/interact/
> > -------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------
To leave this list, email <listserver@keelynet.com>
with the body text: leave Interact
list archives and on line subscription forms are at
http://keelynet.com/interact/
-------------------------------------------------------------