constants, only variables that do not vary much.
Somewhere along the line, the point of whether light speed is a constant =
or
not became the issue, and what was the original argument? Even the theor=
y of
gravity is subject to debate, whether it is a push force or a pull force,=
and
is a vacuum (as we can produce for instance in a bell jar) truly a vacuum=
- or
is there still a substance (aether) which we cannot extricate from a give=
n
space? =
I apologize if any of this offends anyone's personal view, but consider t=
hat
it is just my own opinion. The glass may well be either half-full, half-=
empty
or even just right. I do understand that theory must be debated or pract=
ice
cannot be accomplished - but we may spend too much time trying to argue o=
ver
the state of the glass, and not enough on putting into practice the theor=
y we
each hold to be true.
That being said, I have a question. According to theory, for every actio=
n or
force there is an equal and opposite action/force. If that is true, and =
the
earth is a negative source, where is the positive? Is it in the atmosphe=
re? =
Or is it just buried deeply in the earth? As far as I know, no drilling
records have encountered a positive source in the earth's crust (yet) so =
there
must exist a positive source equal to the negative of the earth. Where m=
ight
this be?
Apologies to those offended, again, and keep plugging.
Oroblanco