Received this interesting email involving gravity and transmutation,
thought the group might like to check it out on his home page.
--------------
"Much of quantum theory's effectiveness stems from its successful
manipulation of Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principal which postulates
every point in space to be a point of energy.
This poses problems within the context of general relativity which
postulates gravitation as a force that increases with mass to such an
extent that as the escape velocity of light is reached, not even light
can escape its attraction.
If both theories are taken at face value, the Uncertainty Principal
predicts so much energy in the universe, that according to the
equivalence postulated for matter and energy by E=mc˛ the gravitational
attraction inferred by general relativity would have collapsed the
entire universe into a "black hole" long ago.
--------------
Dear Sir:
I recently learned of the work of W.C. Wright and through such about the
Institute for New Energy and its affiliates.
I was delighted to discover through Internet links that there are so
many individuals who disagree with the idea of gravity as an attracting
force.
For 15 years now I have been advocating the same theme except that these
conclusions were drawn from the nature of empty space (if you remember
that the gravitational field in General Relativity has been designated
as "Spacetime").
Also about 13 years ago I happened upon an individual, M.E. Winfield who
was using electric theory to explain gravitation. He had conducted some
remarkable experiments…one of which turned Chromium into
Manganese in an instant. This was a jump of one complete increment on
the Atomic Scale.
My work is on the opposite side of the spectrum, but encompasses the
idea that the manifestation of all forces are the result of a repulsing
charge which simply appears to be creating attracting mechanisms. It
also creates the electric charge, but is not the electric charge per se.
One innate conclusion is that all geometric laws (spatial laws) are a
result of this same energy geometry. This has recently become a tenet of
String Theory and I feel that these theorists hold the best hope of
sewing all the new views together. This is partly because they are
mostly young mathematicians, not physicists who tend to be hampered by
conventional thought.
They are often so skilled in math that their work scares even
accomplished physicists. Many are unemployed and represent a tremendous
potential for research.
One of several applications having practical potential is a motor, which
has 3 broad applications within about 48 different designs. As I have
been more preoccupied with the aforementioned theory, little has
been done with the motor.
Would be most interested in making use of this potential. Present hurdle
lies in acquiring worldwide Patent protection prior to any marketing
attempts. Any suggestions would be appreciated.
Theory is still my main focus. A Website with a small but salient
portion of the theory may be found at:
http://members.tripod.com/Exmatrix/abstract.html
Best regards,
Francis Pedley
fpedley@ican.net
ICQ# 25966070
-- Jerry Wayne Decker / jdecker@keelynet.com http://keelynet.com / "From an Art to a Science" Voice : (214) 324-8741 / FAX : (214) 324-3501 KeelyNet - PO BOX 870716 - Mesquite - Republic of Texas - 75187