Re: Antigravity and Sound

Ted Gallop ( gallope@planet.curtin.edu.au )
Thu, 08 Jul 1999 15:42:58

>To: interact@keelynet.com
>From: Marinus Berghuis <renkahu@ihug.co.nz>
>Subject: Keely and latest postings disassociation of water.
>
>
>Fellow searchers.
>
>I have a few questions, the mathematical genii can solve for us.
>Keely stated that he obtained 20000 p.s.i from 3 drops of water inside a 14
>inch sphere.
>To hold this pressure with the technology of the day, needed at least a 5
>inch thick wall.
>At the most he had a cavity of 4 inches diameter at 20000 p.s.i of gas
>pressure because that is what it would be in this material world. How many
>cubic feet of gas would this equate ??
>I cannot afford to get a sphere made but I can afford to buy a c.n.g. tank
>rated at 2000 p.s.i. with a safety limit of 6000 p.s.i at 100 litre
>capacity. Everybody is throwing them out and in fact I own one but is 1200
>km away.
>
Hi Ren and others,

First point...
I will leave the maths to others who can convert the litres to cubic inches
and PSI etc.

Second point...
If I recall correctly Keely's sphere was 14 cubic inches volume. If I still
recall correctly, the volume of a sphere is 4/3 pi r**3 making the sphere
only 1.5 inches in radius or 3 inches in diameter. That sounds rather
small, so it makes me a bit suspicious of the figures quoted in the book.
But it would be easier to build one that size to hold the huge presures. (I
thought it was closer to 110,000 psi)

Third...
I think the use of a sphere by Keely was intentional. He mentions the place
of sympathetic resonance as being at the one third position, or something.
I'll have to go back and read it, but I have the distinct impression that
the shape of the container was important. (i.e a sphere) so a non-spherical
substitute may cause difficulties. (what is, and what shape is, a c.n.g.tank?)

Cheers,
Ted Gallop