Stacked Stimulated Superconductors

Jerry W. Decker ( (no email) )
Wed, 30 Jun 1999 21:03:49 -0500

Hi Folks!

Comes another email with interesting ideas that someone here might be
willing to help on. I have responded but here is the email so you can
read and respond if you so desire;
--------
I am a great fan of the site and have read it extensively.

> Thanks we all do what we can.

I am wondering if you could put me in touch with or answer my questions.
I have an idea for making an electricity generator from an alternator,
but to use an alternator, I think that some models can produce 120 VAC
without the bridge rectifier. Problem is, that this ac is more than 60
hertz. I need to know how to build a frequency stepper to "step-down"
the frequency from the 2000-5000 hz to a more wanted 60 hertz. Someone
suggested a frequency driver circuit connected to a SCR circuit to
stabilize the voltage at 120 VAC or 240 VAC if passed thru a step-up
transformer.

> Well, a stepdown refers to voltage being stepped down, not frequency.
> You could use the bridge rectifier to produce DC that could feed an
> inverter to produce stable 120VAC which is what your frequency driver
> circuit would be, a kind of power oscillator. An inverter would
> greatly simplify this need.

The other part of my idea should be forwarded to whomever it may be of
interest to

Get Bearden and company to investigate an array of the gravity-shielding
superconductors spinning in liquid nitrogen. If one can lessen gravity
by 2% then it stands to reason that 10 stacked in a vertical array
should be able to lessen gravity above them

(The effect claimed by: James E. Cox in his new journal ANTIGRAVITY NEWS
and SPACE DRIVE TECHNOLOGY Vol 1.No. 2 (July-August edition) describes
how we may now start thinking (put on your engineering hats, folks!)

about how to apply the Podkletnov/Schnurer (and others) superconductor
g-shield results to potentially useful future hardware.

He proposes a modular arrangement of SC layers, each one yields the
demonstrated 2% reduced weight (column effect up to infinity) so the
lift equation is quite simple: F = (g-coef) (14.7 psi) (SC-area, inch
squared) (N,layers) Podkletnov showed that the PRINCIPLE OF
SUPERPOSITION is valid, when he stacked two devices and got 4%
shielding.

For the Dr. Schnurer device with 1" dia. SC, at 5% (or .05) g-shield
coefficient, the lifting force is about 9 ounces. )

> That stacking effect for a combined weight reduction column, to my
> knowledge has yet to be proven. Remember a supercondutor passes
> current which produces a super strong magnetic field and provides
> for diamagnetic repulsion as with the flying frogs who are still
> playing at; http://www-hfml.sci.kun.nl/hfml/levitate.html

Now that is all fine and already thought of so ok.....BUT!!! What no
one seems to have thought of is a support mechanism for keeping the
nitrogen liquid by using Bearden's suggested Scalar weather control by
biasing the scalar projector to create a low pressure area where the
nitrogen is and thereby by biasing the generator EXTREMELY on the
cold generating side you should be able to generate supra low
temperatures and keep the nitrogen cold. Perhaps this is where the
reports of frozen animals falling out of the sky has come from...?

> And this cooling or heating effect using directed scalars remains
> purely theoretical (again to the best of my knowledge) where no
> one has proven that it really works, let alone reliably.

ALSO! By "stacking" an array of shields you could create an antigravity
well where objects would float up to orbit thus eliminating the
expensive earth to orbit rocket racket as their gravity would be
cancelled. This is only with 10 units, by using 30 units what could be
the result? Super accellerated projection of items up the well? We
could term a projectile launching mechanism of this type a Gravitic
Projector. This gould result unfortunately in the development of pulsed
array gravity weapons.

> If I recall correctly, the effect extends about 30 feet max.

Also as I do not have Mr. Bearden's email, could you ask him if he sent
Kramer any Fogal Transistors: (Fogal has developed a transistor that
appears to have superconducting properties. Bill Fogal's "device"
allows access to the "coulomb gauge" after Whittaker interferometry in a
NLO junction on a bipolar transistor's emitter junction. He forms a new
class of semiconductor using a small tantalum capacitor (NLO optical)
bonded to the transistor.

This is an extension to electrodynamics that is soon to hit the market.
It allows all kinds of new applications to be achieved. These include
superluminal communications and noiseless, expanded bandwidth data
channels. )

> Unfortunately, the soon to hit the market scenario has been extant
> for about 5 years now with this not happening. I'm not sure what
> the hold up is, but Fogal is a nice guy and definitely has something
> though the yields for working devices are low since they were back
> in 1995 or so being made on his kitchen table.

the late Philip Kramer of Iron Butterfly and his company as Philip
Taylor Kramer, one-time bassist for the rock group Iron Butterfly,
disappeared on February 12'th, 1996, and hasn't been seen or heard from
since. Among the computer networks, news of his disappearance created
only a minor flurry of comments by rock music fans yet for the most part
his disappearance remained of little interest. Until, that is, the
rumors came down from both reliable and dubious sources that Kramer
was working on a faster-than-light communications system just before his
disappearance.The reason for this suggestion was the fact that just days
before his disappeared, Kramer and his father believed they had worked
out a mathematical breakthrough which would allow the nearly
instantaneous transmission of matter which would also revolutionize the
communications industry. "We're talking 'Beam me up Scotty' time," The
research deals with a mathematical representation describing
faster-than-light communication employing gravitational waves and
magnetic particles.

> Can you say drugs? If they really had worked out something like
> that, it would be to their enormous protection to publish it as
> soon as possible...that whole story always smacked to me of
> shenanigans that have nothing to do with research or suppression
> of advanced science, sorry, but that's just my opinion.

Thanks, in advance, please forward this to all interested.
Edward Dobson
mrhemp@ns.sympatico.ca

--            Jerry Wayne Decker  /   jdecker@keelynet.com         http://keelynet.com   /  "From an Art to a Science"      Voice : (214) 324-8741   /   FAX :  (214) 324-3501   KeelyNet - PO BOX 870716 - Mesquite - Republic of Texas - 75187