...for some wide-ranging, thought provoking,
and very overlooked physics, see:
THE NATURE AND ORIGIN OF COMETS AND
THE EVOLUTION OF CELESTIAL BODIES
by J.M. MC CANNEY
http://www.millenngroup.com/repository/cometary/ori1.html
(six pages total)
a few excerpts:
"Part III will introduce the induced electric dipole
red-shift concept(60) and show how it accounts for the
anomalous red-shift data that currently are under
controversy in the astronomical community. It will also
discuss a theory for geomagnetic field formation with the
dynamo powered by a planet spinning inside a slightly
charged moon, and show a correlation between magnetic field
reversals and the external effects of a highly charged comet
passing close to the planet. It will further discuss
biological evolution and celestial catastrophism, and the
collective fear of Velikovsky that has permeated the
scientific community for the past 35 years."
"Another conclusion is that quasars are not superluminous
objects at the edge of the universe, but are much closer
than proposed by the use of the Hubble constant. With the
previous paper's results,(6) it is apparent that quasars
are the initial formative stages of normal galaxies (see
footnote No. 39 of Part 1, KRONOS IX:1)."
"This implies that the bizarre theoretical extrapolations of
General Relativity and the Big Bang Theory, such as "black
holes", nonEuclidean space, and the "expanding universe"
are no more than elements of some scientists' imaginations.
Einstein himself was openly critical of General Relativity
as "it did not include the total field (electric and
magnetic)".(7) It is apparent that this was related to his
interest in Velikovsky's work, although neither lived long
enough to resolve the issue."
..