You can probably experiment from the patent and get it to work, but it would
probably be time consuming. You need to know the exact clearances to use for
the rod and inner chamber, and the clearances of the inner and outer
chambers. The plans are good to have as they also contain information on
building an air management system, and they don't cost that much. Plus, then
you would have a license to build and use one legally. And you'd be happy to
know that GEET donates 25% of all profits back to the communities that have
made purchases. So, I whole-heartedly support people in buying their own
sets of plans.
The length of the rod is also important and it depends on the fuel you are
using. A longer rod will tend to work good with "dirty fuels" such as crude
oil or soda pop, while the shorter rod would work well with gasoline and
diesel fuels.
Yes, you can build a chamber for burning such "fuels" such as plastic
bottles. I don't remember having heard about wood being used but I wouldn't
be surprised. They built a tent over pavement and were able to run one off
of the petroleum vapors coming off of the blacktop. I sketched out a design
for a car that can collect these vapors from the pavement as you drive,
essentially providing a car that has limitless fuel. Another suggestion
someone made was to build in an onboard juicer that juices the grass as you
mow, providing fuel in the form of grass juice. Incidentally, they just got
a diesel VW Rabbit to run on 80% carrot juice! So now they know that "The
wabbit wuns on cawwit juice!"
The reaction chamber appears to transmute carbon based "fuels" into hydrogen.
Looking at the Walter Russell charts of the elements you would see that
carbon and hydrogen are exactly 180 degrees apart from one another, or up
half an octave. It seems that it would be pretty easy to cause such a
transmutation using the differences in pressures and temperatures that are
being applied in the chamber.
I recently spoke with Dr. Tim Binder who has researched and done experiments
using Russell's principles and he has been able to transmute nitrogen into
hydrogen, as well as create what Russell would call a sub-hydrogen element.
These sub-hydrogen elements are known to science as isotopes of hydrogen, but
Russell says this is a mistake as they are full tonal elements in and of
themselves and are not parts of hydrogen. I don't think he wanted me to
mention what element they created as his tone indicated that it wasn't
something he really wanted people knowing about as of yet. But, he did say
that they are working on transmuting any element into any other element using
Russell's science.
I believe that using the GEET device, one may be able to transmute nitrogen
from the air directly into hydrogen as fuel, with a few adjustments. I am
considering trying experiments using refrigerants as fuel next. I am also
curious what would happen using a small amount of liquid nitrogen as fuel.
I encourage you to get plans and experiment till your heart's content. There
are so many variations you can try and see what works best. I'm having a
blast with it myself!
Warm regards,
Peter