If you have a few minutes, you might want to check out this report
written by Harold Aspden about three free energy technologies claimed to
have been witnessed and broadcast on British TV several years ago.
They include Jim Griggs Hydrosonic pump (which is suspected of using
thermal differentials - a heat pump) to produce more energy out than it
takes to drive the pump, the Chernetski device which puts out five times
more than input and even a claim about having witnessed Stan Meyers
device, check it out;
http://www.padrak.com/ine/FEONBRTV.html
Jim Griggs of Hydrodynamics, Inc. demonstrated the assembly and
operation of a "hydrosonic water pump" which operated over-unity by
producing hot water or steam with energy in excess of the electrical
energy input to the pump motor. "Over-unity" was confirmed by satisfied
customers, including the Albany Fire Station, where engineers from the
"local university" and the "local power company" had been called in to
verify the over-100% efficiency.
The presentation was impressive. A drum-type rotor close-fitting within
a cylindrical housing had numerous holes In its surface, which
presumably produced vortices and turbulence and acted as a pump driving
water through the apparatus.
---------
Next came reference to Tesla and from there we were introduced to the
Chernetskii theme, 5:1 over-unity power generation in Moscow using
plasma arc discharges. This we knew about from the Novosti Press release
03NTO-890717CMO4 in 1989. The facade of an academic institution in
Moscow appeared on the T.V. screen. Then there were shots of an
apparatus working and illuminating a set of lamps. Hal Puthoff had
visited Chernetskii in 1991 to witness the device working, but sadly
Professor Chernetskii had died shortly after that, in 1992, and that
free energy pursuit had not been taken up.
----------
After Hal Puthoff's review of the Chernetskii story there was a very
substantial treatment of the Stan Meyer activity in generating hydrogen
from water. This included a fascinating demonstration of an apparatus
comprising a column of water in which there were several pairs of
concentric alloy metal tubes functioning as electrodes.
Upon switching on the electrical power there was instantaneous emission
of gas, the combustible properties of which were said to be three times
the electrical input, in energy terms. This was supported by Dr. Keith
Hindley, a U.K. research consultant, who had visited Meyer several
times.
----------
Aspden says, I have very good reason for believing that a radial
electric field set up between a cathode and a concentric cylindrical
anode will develop "vacuum spin" which draws in energy from the aether.
I cannot resist adding here my own observation: if the free energy
source comes from an electrical coupling with something in motion in the
aether, then that something could be a spin about a fixed direction in
space.
In that case, bearing in mind that the laboratory test bench on body
Earth reorientates its direction in space as a function of time of day,
I would expect the performance of such a "free energy" apparatus to be
"different every time the device runs."
After all, a clock ought to give a different reading every time one
looks at it!
Nor can I resist noting that I have very good reason for believing that
a radial electric field set up between a cathode and a concentric
cylindrical anode will develop "vacuum spin" which draws in energy from
the aether. This energy (as in the homopolar magnet N-machine) is shed
as electrical charge displacement and enhances ionization in the water
if between those electrodes.
In the Patterson apparatus the metallized beads facilitate recombination
of ions to produce heat, whereas in the Meyer apparatus the ions are
segregated on the separate electrodes and form gas molecules of hydrogen
and oxygen at the respective electrodes.
Even in the Griggs hydrosonic pump I wonder if the drum rotor, being a
metal conductor rotating in the Earth's magnetic field but separated
from the casing by a thin layer of water which has a high dielectric
constant, might allow vacuum spin build-up owing to the Faraday disc
induction of a radial electric held. (These comments will be better
understood when I publish what I have to say on the "virtual inertia"
theme.)
---
Jerry Wayne Decker / jdecker@keelynet.com
http://keelynet.com / "From an Art to a Science"
Voice : (214) 324-8741 / FAX : (214) 324-3501
KeelyNet - PO BOX 870716 - Mesquite - Republic of Texas - 75187