Soule annotates comments by Jagnow

Gary Vesperman ( (no email) )
Wed, 9 Dec 1998 11:44:10 -0800

Forwarded from Evan Soule'.

Gary Vesperman
vman@skylink.net

>>
>> Accordingly: There was no "steam" involved in the process since the
carbon
>> rods were TOTALLY IMMERSED UNDER WATER. Also, Stefan Hartmann did not
>
>==============
>
>Typo: Should have said: "did produce"
>
>
>> produce HYDROGEN AND CARBON MONOXIDE with ONLY 7.2 WATTS OF INPUT POWER
>> INTO HIS ENTIRE NEWMAN MOTOR DEMONSTRATION!
>>
>--
>Hartmann Multimedia Service, Dipl. Ing. Stefan Hartmann
>Keplerstr. 11 B, 10589 Berlin, Germany
>Tel: ++ 49 30-345 00 497 FAX: ++ 49 30-345 00 498
>email: harti@harti.com Web site: http://www.harti.com
>http://ccard.net fuer Ihren Verkauf im WEB !

I believe what is meant is that the hydrogen and carbon monoxide were not
produced with only 7.2 watts of input power, but rather thru (as you have
accurately presented) the current-carrying capacity of the large
back-spikes from the Motor. And yes, you are right when you pointed out
that only 7.2 watts of input power (were EXTERNALLY applied) into the
entire Newman Motor Demonstration.

Hope this clarifies it!

Best,

Evan