---Gerald O'Docharty wrote:
> Gee Jerry, you are getting warmer. Now lets see...
you wrote:
> I have seen a report that acoustically stimulated soap bubbles will
> REPEL when two bubbles vibrate at the same frequency and attract when
> not at the same frequency.
Wow, just like the electon/lepton "particles" do in my explanation of
the cause of the attraction or repulsion force (ie gravity, magnetism,
walking across the room, etc). They too are sphericle like soap
bubbles but instead are spherical waves.
*** The cool thing about the soap bubbles is it was an experiment
that was actually done, not just speculated or theorized.
Actually Keely's explanation is nearly identical but in different
terminology. Except Keely's is backwards,
like most of our science, tending to work from the gross toward the
subtle. I prefer to proceed from the infinite, or absolute beginning
and move toward the generation of substance.
*** If Keely had it 'backwards' how come he is in the history books
with all these anecdotal stories about phenomena? How come his
motors, if we are to believe the many reports; WORKED?
> Found this incredible set of pages that you just have to check out.
> Many of my friends and associates are of the opinion that mass is a
> standing wave and that it can be disrupted or enhanced. I've only
> begun to read the attached URLs but they are very exciting.
> Larry Spring out in Fort Bragg, CA did experiments with various
> antenna and found that waves propagate in a spherical form.
Huh?... This is only now being figured out?
You just about have all the pieces. Now you need to put it together.
Take another look at my "gravitron" machine drawings every now and
then. Did you ever get my brief write-up that explains the
componentry? (still
waiting for replacement parts to arrive in 2035, hehe, (kidding))
:-) - Gerald
*** Glad you have it all figured out Gerald...;->
*** Though in all truth and honesty, IF its all figured out by
WHOMEVER, let's see the hardware to prove it.....
*** ...just another claim? naw, couldn't be that...we wouldn't be so
gullible AGAIN (and again, and again, and again...)
*** Some of us have FINALLY learned to ASK for proof or to otherwise
make sure the claimant CLEARLY STATES it is theory or concept or
opinion, that it is not based on actual EMPIRICAL OBSERVATION, as in
built, tested, proven and duplicated independently by others.
*** So, pardon my sketicism & cynicism (seems to increase with age),
but I'll reserve judgement on ANYONE, yes, even including Mr. Gerald
who I know to be a very bright fellow, claiming to have all the
answers, or even a great many of them, until I and the world at large
can see tangible, useable proof of such knowledge.
*** In the meantime, a piece here, a nugget there, some things fit,
some need to be discarded, but eventually SOMEONE will be able to
PROVE an advanced understanding.
***....hope its me, but I don't think so at this point and I REALIZE
IT...but that could change at any moment..it would be great it if was
you or anyone else on the KeelyNet discussion list, heck ANYWHERE..
*** Though it will probably be someone fresh and uncontaminated with
all the theories, seeing things from their own perspective and putting
them together to prove or disprove the concept.
*** So, I'm still fascinated with mechanical and electrical
resonance, as well as what in the UFO genre might provide technical
clues that can be DUPLICATED in some kind of experiment, that was why
I posted it.
*** I've been burned with the racoon pattern from the welding
goggles....kind of neat but shows how something as simple as invisible
light could be. Never had the grainy conjuctivitis symptoms...sounds
horrible....I needs my eyes...<g>...
_________________________________________________________
DO YOU YAHOO!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com