Chris
At 11:19 AM 11/30/98 -0800, Jerry Wayne Decker wrote:
>Hi Folks!
>
>With regard to interferring with gravity by using high voltage fields
>as from one or more Tesla coils. I received this intriguing post from
>an experimenter that I thought everyone here might be interested in.
>He might send in a detailed paper of the experiment so others can
>duplicate and/or further research the phenomenon. It is highly
>reminiscent of the gravity drop tests by Don Kelly and Richard Hull
>which showed that coils wound in moebius/caduceus shapes would fall
>slower, even moreso with power applied.
>=======================
>
>> You wrote:
>> ( about me writing )
>>
>> >That is an intriguing P.S. you made...is that one or more powered
>> >gyros with small Tesla coils? How many gryros, how many coils and
>> >what is placement?
>> >
>> >The idea of a spinning electrostatic field is seminal to both Searl
>> >and Hamel who claim it will produce anomalous effects primarily
>weight
>> >loss. Also a guy named Pearson claims that when two energies collide
>> >against each other, they can produce an excess of up to 18% more
>> >energy than the original energy used in the collision...
>>
>==========================
>> (me now)
>>
>> Jerry
>>
>> There are no actual gyro's.
>> It was a board about two foot by three with tesla coils at the
>corners.
>> they were wired so the current flows in the big (pimary) windings
>(at about
>> 0.001 A, 10kv) were perpendicular to the long axis of the board. The
>coils
>> were aprox 10,000 windings on the primary, 10 on the 'control', and
>wired
>> parallel. When you twist a gyro in one perpendicular axis (to the
>spin), it
>> trys to twist in the other perpendicular axis. This was seen in this
>setup,
>> but the opposing tesla coil prevented the twist and so it was easy
>to twist on
>> the spin axis, yet almost impossible to twist in the other two.
>>
>> My physics tutor belived the electron flows were providing the gyro
>> 'stabalising' effect, although the momentum was worked out to be
>about 0.2
>> newtons. The board could be moved by adjusting the control coils to
>lower
>> the effect along one edge of he board, and then that could be raised
>or
>> lowered about the perpendicular axis. once the coils were '
>neutralised' the
>> board world fall slowly back to the table, much slower than it would
>with
>> gravity, ie, visibly and measurably slower. This provides evidence
>for an
>> anti gravity effect, and this was put in our final paper.
>>
>> Unfortunatly, the tutor didn't/couldn't believe this ( the anti
>gravity bit),
>> even when presented with files from Keely, and we failed this
>coursework
>> (bummer.)
>>
>> I would like to try research into this, but I am doing Chemical
>Engineering
>> as a degree, and don't have much chance. The only working tesla coil
>i have
>> built (2 foot d. primary) is providing a lighting effect for discos
>in the
>> hall of residence I was in last year. ( 10' sparks! Behind a perspex
>screen
>> 6' behing the DJ) and the won't give it back, saying I gave it to
>them and
>> so it's theirs.
>>
>> Sorry that may be a personal rant, but, hey people need to know the
>perils of
>> lending people their tesla coils.
>>
>> P.S. dont try the spark effect near aluminum. Apparently x-rays,
>capable
>> of damaging human tissue are liberated.
>>
>> P.P.S. Are you a researcher, enthusiast, or just site master? The
>reply to
>> my e-mail kind of negates the latter, but there we go.
>
>_________________________________________________________
>DO YOU YAHOO!?
>Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------
> To leave this list, email <listserver@dallastexas.net>
> with the body text: leave Keelynet
> list archives and on line subscription forms are at
> http://dallastexas.net/keelynet/
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>