With regard to manifestation of matter from SUSTAINED high energy
static or dynamic fields.
At a conference a few years back, I met two guys who were planning to
go to Missouri or somewhere in that region to visit a private lab. As
I recall the conversation, they said this inventor had a basement
where he was experimenting with inert gases, phase conjugation,
radionics and plasma.
The story was he had a glass plate which offered a view into a sealed
chamber where some mixture of electrified inert gas was present.
The guy SAID that if you looked at plate sitting on a platform inside
the chamber, you could concentrate for a period on an image and it
would appear on the plate, made up of the inert gas plasma so that
others could see it. He was very secretive as to who was doing this
but he and his partner were also very excited about getting a chance
to witness this for themselves..
Now, it sounds exactly like the Krell Helmet from the movie 'Forbidden
Planet', where sustained concentration could materialize an image of
whatever you projected, depending on your brain power and ability to
concentrate.
I hate to drift off here but the following does correlate.
In line with this are reports from the early days of power generation
using AC generators where high density magnetic fields and coronas
around machines would have hands, feet and even faces appear in the
corona.
These weren't the piddly coronas we see with our high voltage
equipment but were several inches or even a foot or so, wide enough to
image something large.
I've seen pictures of them and they look like the 'ectoplasm'
projections from a seance.
The idea being that discarnate entities could project their will with
sufficient intensity as to influence the shape of plasma, just like we
'will' our hands and body parts to move and sense so too could 'they'
will the chaotic plasma to respond. I keep thinking that would make a
cool file though not f/e, etc. related, but it is bizarre and I think
might have applications for research.
The contention that there is 'no such thing' as mind over matter
completely ignores the fact that we hear, see, touch, move, etc.
simply by mind over matter.
So its not a stretch to think that this mental influence could be
extended beyond the mind to affect matter. Keely called it the
'sympathetic attendant' governed by 'cerebellic fields'.
I think it might account for some of the weirder free energy reports
like Daniel in Canada.
The same applies to the erroneous contention that there is 'no such
thing' as free energy, yet planets and electrons orbit despite this
'belief'.
One other tiein with your idea that high density static or dynamic
energies could well precipitate into matter is that of Schappeller as
in the file;
http://www.keelynet.com/gravity/searl3.htm
"This primary magnetism caused a gathering of the surrounding space
fabric and FROM IT issued more fundamental energy as an
INTENSIFICATION of the primary magnetism.
At a certain stage, the system reached an EQUILIBRIUM GATHERING space
fabric, and FROM IT PRECIPITATED ENERGY. When the energy DENSITY
reached a required level, matter would be PRODUCED. The system would
take up a spherical form in the "natural" state and become what
Schappeller called "glowing magnetism".
Glowing magnetism, he claimed, constituted the core of all planets and
suns, the gravitational core of which was DUE to the glowing magnetism
AT ITS CORE. How this theory fits the universal law of gravitation is
at first difficult to see."
======================
I always thought this 'gathering of the space fabric' was so
interesting as it is exactly what orgone manipulation does to produce
weather changes. Like running the palm of your hand through water
against an incoming wave...it repels it back, causing it to roil over
on itself...thus in air, moisture precipitates into droplets and
produces rain.
I think this same 'gathering' can be done to aether/zpe to
'precipitate' energy or even force.
======================
Dusty Rhodes wrote;
> I like to call it a "Metamorphosis of Energy to Matter" for want of
a better
> term.
> >
> > The other thing is the properties of energy in a vacuum and how they
> > might well attach to other energies such as zpe/aether so that you
got
> > more out than in.
> >
> > Hurwitsch says it is something that is so BASIC that we are missing
> > it...I am so tired of hearing that, that we are missing WHAT???
>
> Hurwitsch must be referring to " the obvious ", which is usually
pretty hard
> to see. Like the best place to hide is in plain sight. Mario Erra
and I have
> been having a conversation about these same things lately. It is he
that I
> have to thank for the Brown pdf file that looks like it didn't
survive as a
> link. So sorry about that. Perhaps Mario will post it for all to
check out
> cause I think some of " the obvious" stuff is being demonstrated
there. And
> like I told Mario, suppose that the universe and all matter in it is
only a
> 'result' of an intense static field and we found a way to short to
ground.
> Talk about an oops!
_________________________________________________________
DO YOU YAHOO!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com