Re: Hydroxy/brown' gas

mbgupta@julian.uwo.ca
Thu, 05 Nov 1998 00:52:40 -0500

For a good overview note by TR I found, while searching for the Knudson
Fuel Cell but to no avail, non the less I found the note useful, at the
following URL:

http://www.eskimo.com/~billb/freenrg/hydroxy.html

Chris Gupta

At 11:04 PM 11/3/98 -0800, you wrote:
>The naming of Brown's gas.
>
>The use of the term "Hydroxy" is not an effort to subvert Yull Brown and
>his efforts. Hydroxy is just the chemical name for this material. For the
>purpose of patent identification as a newly discovered state of mater Brown
>simply chose to call this discovery Browns gas. From the date of those
>patents, he began to refer to the hydroxyl by the name granted under the
>patent, Brown's gas.
>
>I worked directly with Brown for many years and in our discussions the two
>terms were used interchangeably. When talking of his discovery, he would
>use the term Brown's gas, when referring to the chemical makeup of the
>material he used the term Hydroxy.
>
>In my posts here I often use both for purposes of clarity, and in all of my
>permanent web posts I use both terminology's. It would serve no value for
>anyone to discount the work of Brown by attempting to cloud the past of
>this technology, as it is more widely known by the more popular name of
>Brown's gas.
>
>Additionally, there was a company making these units in the US, in the
>early 80s in Texas. The Company chose the name Hydroxy USA. Brown
>attempted to engage them in litigation not for the correct use of the
>chemical term for this gas, but that the design of their production
>machines infringed on his patents.
>
>The correct chemical term for this gas is Hydroxy. The existence of the
>hydroxyl reaction is well known in science. If you review any premier text
>of physiology, you will find this reaction mentioned over and over as the
>unspecified source of bond force energy that is responsible for most
>biologic functioning, as well as the linking found in the very structure of
>DNA.
>
>Brown knew clearly, that what he had isolated in his simple welder, would
>some day be the core technology in a great many sciences. The production
>and distribution of the welder was nothing more that a toy in comparison to
>what this technology will reveal to science.
>Here on a bench top is the basic energy of all major chemical bonds in
>nature. Hydroxyl bonds!
>
>To break the connection between Browns gas and Hydroxyl reactions would be
>a greater disservice to science than any minor confusion that may arise.
>Brown had isolated the very mechanism of life, let alone a system that
>binds metals.
>
>TR Knudtson
>