This is awesome, thanks.
At 07:27 AM 10/31/98 -0800, Barry Carter wrote:
>
>The uppermost layer of the mantle would be this magnetic fluid. It is made
>more rigid by the earth's magnetic field. If the earth's magnetic field
>were to reverse, as sometimes happens, the magnetic field would not be
>holding this magnetic fluid in place to the same extent. If, when a
>magnetic reversal happened, the crust of the earth was also out of balance,
>there would be the possibility of the crust slipping on the mantle of the
>earth.
Well if the icecaps were trimmed that may help balance. Einstein also
predicted that the bedrock under the icecap is a mushy slippery paste by
now. Verticle trimming may be better than a horizontal crewcut of the icecap?
>It would help to imagine a sphere, like a baseball, with a gyroscope
>inside. Imagine that the core of this baseball is coated with a viscous
>oil which changes its viscosity depending on the strength of the magnetic
>field surrounding it. If the viscosity of the oil was high, because of a
>strong magnetic field, and you grabbed the outside of the baseball and
>tried to twist it counter to the spin of the gyroscope inside, it would
>resist your twist quite effectively. But if you did the same thing and the
>magnetic field was weak, the oil would act as a lubricant and allow the
>skin of the baseball to follow the twist imparted by your hand while the
>gyroscopic core of the baseball remained aligned to the spin of the gyroscope.
Magnetophoresis is it called? How about Searl inverse g vehicles turned
upside down (r mode?) and distibuted on the Earth's surface. The idea being
that the magnetic vortex and propulsive force of the IGV would pin the crust
to the mantle like a thumbtack? But there is a 1/4 radius field grounding
issue. And, normally the field of a r (repulsion field) design will vaporise
the iron in the ground and leave a funny cone shaped hole. I don't know if
the Searl device could be tuned to just push on the ground real hard and
emit a wide beam (large radius to focal point?) magnetic vortex into the
ground with out melting anything. Just increasing viscosity of the
magnetophoretic layer would be good. Could the field be custom tuned for
this I wonder? Could such IGV's properly placed counteract a pole reversal?
We need space time fabric instrumentation.
>According to a book titled "The Jupiter Effect" by astrophysicist John
>Gribbin and physicist Stephen Plagemann, the earth's magnetic field
>reversals might be triggered by a magnetic field reversal of the sun which,
>in turn, might be triggered by in the region of the galaxy through which
>the sun is passing. Further triggering factors would be planetary
>alignments which can put stronger tidal forces into the mix.
I wonder if there is some kind of instrumentation that can read and predict
these conditions? If so, let's build it!
>The interaction of all of these forces would determine the rapidity and
>extent of any polar shift. The rapidity and extent of a polar shift would,
>in turn, relate to the effect on human civilization.
>Most of the prophets who have prophesized polar shifts indicate that these
>events are related to the state of human consciousness. In other words,
>changing human consciousness can change the extent of these types of
>disasters. The type of co-operation implied in your polar icecap
>levitation proposal would be an indicator of a major change of human
>consciousness. I believe that such a change in human consciousness would
>be a greater mitigating factor in the possibility or extent of a polar
>shift than would the levitation activity be itself.
OK, what have we got so far - IGV thumbtacks, icecap trim, Dennis Lee type
educational messages (it's not spam), anything else? Let's try them all! I
think I'm beginning to feel a little better now. My mom used to say, "you've
got a good hope". I think I took that literally. Is it OK to foward your
message Barry? I think saving the world might be a fun and worthwhile thing
to do!
Best Regards;
Dennis
Tall Ships
http://pw1.netcom.com/~atech/tallship.html