The CF answer? (was Re: A cheaper 3rd suggestion with an

Dennis C. Lee ( (no email) )
Thu, 29 Oct 1998 08:57:59 -0500

>Date: Thu, 29 Oct 1998 08:54:22 -0500
>To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
>From: "Dennis C. Lee" <atech@ix.netcom.com>
>Subject: The CF answer? (was Re: A cheaper 3rd suggestion with an
experiment protocol. Palladium: 29 isotope states, 6 stable.)
>Cc: Alan Cheah, Alex Frolov, Amatul Hannan, Andy Yett, Angie Hose, Ann
Powers, Bosco So, Dale Pond, Devon Tassen, Dr. Cassandra Smith, Dr. Charles
Cantor, Dustin Lee, Eben Gay, Ed Hill, Eric Howlett, Eric J. Pierce, Fiona
F, Frank Moy, freenrg, George Cheah, Hermann Wellenstein, Howard I. Cohen, J
Okor
>
>Hi;
>
>I was trying to suggest a possible mechanism as to how strange elements and
particles can originate. David Hudson spent 5 million dollars investigating
monatomics. It requires 3-4 months of study to get a handle on it. It is
worthwhile effort.
>
>
>At 10:45 AM 10/28/98 -0800, you wrote:
>>October 28, 1998
>>
>>Vortex,
>>
>>My suggestions did not grow out of zero. It grows out of interactions
>>such we are having now to nuture hints picked up here and there. It's a
>>continuing basis of education I think. Thank you.
>>I find the Vortex useful. It is certainly 'democratic' in the quality of
>>the posts with the least denominator (notice I left out 'common') having
>>equal voice in things to irritation though, many times. oh well.
>
>Sorry if you refer to me. I've resigned myself that nothing positive can be
done about the icecap except crossing one's fingers. I give up. Are you happy?
>
>>I thought furthur on the subject, reflecting on Scott's reference about
>>Bush. I see he ran "after the effect" analysis. Similar to Tom Passell's
>>effort, long not recognized enough (I realize now). I would give
>>reference
>>to Jed to look up Tom Passell's work when he asked what became of the
>>used
>>electrodes of past experiments.
>
>It would be interesting to look for monatomics. I have a few friends at MIT
labs that would let me test for monatomics. I don't know if David Hudson
would give me the exact spectroscopy profile but I know the range the IR
doublet should be within.
>
>>Bush's analysis are fine in giving him some indications of isotope
>>specific
>>effects on a pd-d experiment. What I find missing then is a protocol,
>>which
>>should have been done in hindsight, of all the experiments: To have
>>examined
>>the palladium samples for isotopic distribution PRIOR to running a pd-d
>>experiment. Also afterwards. Then my suggestions on isotope specificity
>>would
>>not have been needed. Or the puzzle continue on erratic replications.
>>
>>The second suggestion was to introduce slow neutrons from external
>>sources
>>rather than wait for neutrons to happen within a high loaded Pd lattice.
>>I believe, in this case, you do not have to load it high to observe or
>>expect
>>effects. And you can use your regular supply of "isotopically alloyed"
>>pure
>>palladium samples, as long as the prior and after protocol of isotopic
>>analysis
>>has been made. This is in essence, a third, cheaper suggestion to
>>finding out
>>about nuclear isotopic effects in loaded palladium when it works.
>
>Has monatomic theory been looked at? It makes sense that palladium atoms
may break free as it is being hydrogen loaded. What about the nature of the
hydrogen bond? Is it monatomic when it is loaded. Does it go from diatomic
to monatomic in the loading process? Is this accounted for in the energy
requirements to break the bond? Does loading into palladium use less energy
to break the hydrogen bond somehow?
>
>I think I have the answer. The weird nuclear stuff is from the monatomic
palladium magnetic field collapse transmuting the atom. The energy is from
monatomic hydrogen recombining as it escapes the lattice. I'm not sure about
superconductor magnetic oversaturation collapse. Would this produce OU energy?
>
>
>>Off Topic:
>>
>> What Planck did not mention was that as new replaces old, he did not
>> pass jugement on whether the old was outmoded or that the new was more
>> valid. So we may be cursed to repeat the past in ignorance if the new
>>is
>> inflexibly rigid as the old.
>>
>> I was amused when the comment was made that "I am not so open minded
>> that my brain falls out". On thinking, it occurred to me that this
>> statement was rather egotisticle (or should the spelling have
>> been egotesticle?) :)
>>
>> What if you did open your mind and and nothing fell out?
>
>I'm looking at a wall of books to my right. We must have different books. I
put at least 20 or 30 hours a week on studies (it's fun to me, weird huh?)
you guys would laugh at. Time will tell. (I'll probably be killed for it)
>
>I have dibs on putting together the superconducting monatomic palladium
oversaturated magnetic field collapse triggered transmutation producing
weird particles source AND the monatomic hydrogen recombination to diatomic
hydrogen producing excess energy source theorems as the basic nature of the
cold fusion process for 10/29/98! Nya-nya plplplplplplplplpl ;)
>
>The Bible says that if people hate you for doing right in this world, your
on the correct track! So I don't care what anyone thinks!
>Dennis C. Lee
>

Tall Ships
http://pw1.netcom.com/~atech/tallship.html