Motor/generator confusion.
Meat Truck ( (no email) )
Thu, 15 Oct 1998 02:37:31 -0500
When a simple DC magnetic motor is operated in reverse as to produce an
action as a generator the following facts are observed;
1) At the point of production of maximum torque as a motor in the
revolution of the armature; correspondingly the inverse action of operation
as a generator consists of zero power output.
2)The motor action thus does not make a mirror copy of its actions when
operated in reverse as a generator.
3) Rather these relations operate in the condition of nature known as a 90
degree phase angle.
4) Properly interpreted if one wishes to attain a superior output in
conjunction with the copying of nature, that same input should express
itself as a two phased input at 90 degrees of phase separation.
5)If each of these phases were to power a series resonant phenomenon then
one phase would produce a full magnetic field @ of full power input. Also
the other phase would concurrently produce a phase containing a full
electric field @ of zero power input
6)These facts concur with the reasoning of conservation of energy in its
expressions. In the first case kinetic energy of charge movement as a
magnetic field is expressed. In the 2nd case the potential energy of
capacitive storage of charge is shown, which is why the 2nd phase phase
concurrently draws nothing. It consists entirely of potential energy.
7)The most misunderstood fact of the conservation of energy consists of the
axiom that both the kinetic and potential energies of an oscillation add to
a constant. This is true for a SINGLE phase. When the kinetic energy
increases,a corresponding decrease of potential energy is noted which makes
these values add to a constant value.
8) Searl has proclaimed in his invention that he has the only device in
which both kinetic and potential energies simultaneously rise, perhaps he
should add that what comes up must come down! Of course I have just shown
such a circumstance.
9)A convincing argument can be shown that if the electric and magnetic
fields involved in resonance from a single phase were allowed to be shown
in the the same space at right angles, a 3rd reaction force known as the
lorentz interaction would be able move charges at right angles to both the
causitive fields. The energies involved in this 3-d movement of charge
would naturally not exceed the input energy. This is because of vector laws
that .707 of an expanding magnetic field could react with .707 of a
collapsing electric field at their respective maximum interaction points
yielding back the energy stored in either field alone.
10)By this reasoning if a full magnetic and full electric field could react
at right angles it should produce more energy than stored in either field
alone. If such a situation could be made an over-unity hypothesis would be
in order.
11)But that hypothesis is predicated on the fact that that two 90 degree
phases of resonances must be used as an input. But also detracting from
this is the fact that two outputs can also be obtained. Also the fact that
at maximum output only one phase supplies actual power or expression as
kinetic energy.
12)In a mathematical correlation of formation of magic squares it is shown
the same exact formulation occurs in the solution to even squares as a
multiple of 4. Paradoxically this solution can be mixed up easily to code
the way that it is logically formed to produce so many solutions as to
become mind boggling. Nevertheless the initial solution always shows a
pairing of increasing and decreasing quantities at right angles. Is nature
teaching us something in its mathematical clues?
Post Script; It has taken me awhile to produce any evidence of my claims.
But what did Sherlock Holmes say? The game is afoot Watson.
Sincere in the work, Harvey D. Norris mnorris@akron.infi.net