PAP IM vs Priore device?

Kenneth Carrigan ( (no email) )
Thu, 8 Oct 1998 10:43:18 -0400

There seems to be possibly similarities to these two devices.
Not sure about Priore device.. as Keelynet has specs on it..
but here is PAP IM device.. and the power & specs behind
it.... seems like a FAST strong magnetic field.. gives good
results. Hey... the Fourier spectrum of an Infinitely Short Pulse
with Infinite amplitude.. is infinite frequency spectrum. Hummm
could this be the key? Static magnetic fields do not seem to
give results... like the Pulsed fields (ex: bone healing and TENs
pain relief).. with Fast rise time, the faster the better.

This also was my theories on the Rife/Bare device. The 27.15MHz
carrier... had to me AM modulated 100% or more. The Fast
on and off times of the carrier along with the modulation frequency
gave off huge RF bandwidths... into a Plasma Tube.. which...
generated a magnetic field.. of high bandwidth. That was the
tricky part too.. is to match the Plasma tube with tuner to obtain
a high H-Field and Low E-Fields. Rife of course must have had
a better On and Off times.. as Bare uses a CB radio.. which has
a lot of limitations. Anyway that is one reason that Bare devices
sometimes do.. sometimes don't produce effects.

I would think we need Huge nanosec Pulsed currents into a
broad banded magnetic field antenna.. like PAP IM or Priore
might have used. That way the very high spectral bandwidth
can get to the cells.. for correction of vibrations, oscillations, or
frequency balancing.

Just my thoughts.. and I could be wrong.

v/r Ken Carrigan