NeXuS wrote:
> Just wondering if the the satellites werent destroyed but just slowed might
> their path be to steep and the wouldnt fall around the earth but into
> it?AHHS FALLING satelites run for ya lives! =) Also arent there programs
> now to place satelites in lower orbitals which is apparently safer?
>
> ----------
> > From: Bill Wallace <btech@surfsouth.com>
> > To: Don J. S. Adams <donadams@telusplanet.net>
> > Cc: Steve <darklord@darknet.net> keelynet@DallasTexas.net
> > Subject: Re: "Satellites May Be Shattered By Invisible Meteors"
> > Date: Monday, October 05, 1998 2:34 PM
> >
> > >Steve, yeah I heard about this... Leonides Meteor Shower. I think
> > >it was wise that you said something as many don't know yet. As for what
> > >to do about it.... well... start digging Bill! ;>
> >
> > I was FOR star wars, not against it, but as is the case with so many
> other
> > problems here, we collectively did not have the vision to see that costs
> > saved then would in reality cost much more in the future, same theme over
> > and over, we never seem to learn. An astronomer friend of mine told me
> of
> > this two years ago, nasa looked at it way before then, the conclusion was
> to
> > just wait and see what happens - as they knew tracking systems were in no
> > way capable of catching everything, the army did some laser testing (in
> part
> > directly related to this threat) years back. It always seemed strange to
> me
> > knowing this at least for four years as a possible major threat they
> > continued putting satellites up, more tax dollars pissed away. If it
> takes
> > down only 15% of the satellites bye bye baby. Recall the outage of ONE
> > Hughes satellite just a few months ago. November this year and next will
> > tell us a lot about our scientists, thier expert predictions, space
> systems,
> > and our reliance on satellite technology. There is a LOT of space out
> there
> > however, and the chances of only a few going down are pretty good, I hear
> 2%
> > outage from several astronomers, costly but not depression causing.
> >
> > >
> > >Bill Wallace wrote:
> > >>
> > >> We just can't seem to get off these end time catastrophes can we? OK
> so
> > you
> > >> have alerted the public that the entire satellite network may crash,
> > taking
> > >> severe economic and technological and communications catastrophes with
> > it,
> > >> the army already looked at high intesity chemical lasers to try and
> stop
> > >> this and it was determined impossible from the sheer numbers of debris
> > that
> > >> will be out there, what do you propose we do to stop this?
> > >>
> > >> -----Original Message-----
> > >> From: Steve <darklord@darknet.net>
> > >> To: keelynet@DallasTexas.net <keelynet@DallasTexas.net>
> > >> Date: Sunday, October 04, 1998 9:24 PM
> > >> Subject: "Satellites May Be Shattered By Invisible Meteors"
> > >>
> > >> >http://www.pufori.org/news/nws1003984.htm
> > >> >--
> > >> > darklord@darknet.net | ICQ: 5113616
> > >> > DarkNet Online: http://www.darknet.net
> > >> >Digital Fusion: http://www.darknet.net/fusion
> > >> >
> > >> > -------------------------------------------------------------
> > >> > To leave this list, email <listserver@dallastexas.net>
> > >> > with the body text: leave keelynet
> > >> > WWW based join and leave forms and KeelyNet list archives
> > >> > are at http://dallastexas.net/keelynet/
> > >> > -------------------------------------------------------------
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >> -------------------------------------------------------------
> > >> To leave this list, email <listserver@dallastexas.net>
> > >> with the body text: leave keelynet
> > >> WWW based join and leave forms and KeelyNet list archives
> > >> are at http://dallastexas.net/keelynet/
> > >> -------------------------------------------------------------
> > >
> > >--
> > >It is my opinion that we are being
> > >manipulated into a belief system
> > >which is reaching a critical point.
> > >Someone wants us to think a certain
> > >way, and things are being set up so
> > >we will follow that perception. It
> > >does not follow that the perception
> > >reflects the truth. It does not follow
> > >that the perception reflects the truth.
> > >
> > >-- Richard Hoagland
> > >
> > >---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >Don J. S. Adams
> > >Managing Consultant
> > >Microsoft
> > >Main Campus, Bldg 1
> > >Redmond, WA
> > >USA
> > >
> > >425-882-3431 USA
> > >403-998-4066 Canada
> > >
> > >http://www.intergate.bc.ca/business/rave
> > >
> > > -------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To leave this list, email <listserver@dallastexas.net>
> > > with the body text: leave keelynet
> > > WWW based join and leave forms and KeelyNet list archives
> > > are at http://dallastexas.net/keelynet/
> > > -------------------------------------------------------------
> > >
> >
> >
> > -------------------------------------------------------------
> > To leave this list, email <listserver@dallastexas.net>
> > with the body text: leave keelynet
> > WWW based join and leave forms and KeelyNet list archives
> > are at http://dallastexas.net/keelynet/
> > -------------------------------------------------------------
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------
> To leave this list, email <listserver@dallastexas.net>
> with the body text: leave keelynet
> WWW based join and leave forms and KeelyNet list archives
> are at http://dallastexas.net/keelynet/
> -------------------------------------------------------------