>Just wondering if the the satellites werent destroyed but just slowed might
>their path be to steep and the wouldnt fall around the earth but into
>it?AHHS FALLING satelites run for ya lives! =) Also arent there programs
>now to place satelites in lower orbitals which is apparently safer?
>
>----------
>> From: Bill Wallace <btech@surfsouth.com>
>> To: Don J. S. Adams <donadams@telusplanet.net>
>> Cc: Steve <darklord@darknet.net> keelynet@DallasTexas.net
>> Subject: Re: "Satellites May Be Shattered By Invisible Meteors"
>> Date: Monday, October 05, 1998 2:34 PM
>>
>> >Steve, yeah I heard about this... Leonides Meteor Shower. I think
>> >it was wise that you said something as many don't know yet. As for what
>> >to do about it.... well... start digging Bill! ;>
>>
>> I was FOR star wars, not against it, but as is the case with so many
>other
>> problems here, we collectively did not have the vision to see that costs
>> saved then would in reality cost much more in the future, same theme over
>> and over, we never seem to learn. An astronomer friend of mine told me
>of
>> this two years ago, nasa looked at it way before then, the conclusion was
>to
>> just wait and see what happens - as they knew tracking systems were in no
>> way capable of catching everything, the army did some laser testing (in
>part
>> directly related to this threat) years back. It always seemed strange to
>me
>> knowing this at least for four years as a possible major threat they
>> continued putting satellites up, more tax dollars pissed away. If it
>takes
>> down only 15% of the satellites bye bye baby. Recall the outage of ONE
>> Hughes satellite just a few months ago. November this year and next will
>> tell us a lot about our scientists, thier expert predictions, space
>systems,
>> and our reliance on satellite technology. There is a LOT of space out
>there
>> however, and the chances of only a few going down are pretty good, I hear
>2%
>> outage from several astronomers, costly but not depression causing.
>>
>> >
>> >Bill Wallace wrote:
>> >>
>> >> We just can't seem to get off these end time catastrophes can we? OK
>so
>> you
>> >> have alerted the public that the entire satellite network may crash,
>> taking
>> >> severe economic and technological and communications catastrophes with
>> it,
>> >> the army already looked at high intesity chemical lasers to try and
>stop
>> >> this and it was determined impossible from the sheer numbers of debris
>> that
>> >> will be out there, what do you propose we do to stop this?
>> >>
>> >> -----Original Message-----
>> >> From: Steve <darklord@darknet.net>
>> >> To: keelynet@DallasTexas.net <keelynet@DallasTexas.net>
>> >> Date: Sunday, October 04, 1998 9:24 PM
>> >> Subject: "Satellites May Be Shattered By Invisible Meteors"
>> >>
>> >> >http://www.pufori.org/news/nws1003984.htm
>> >> >--
>> >> > darklord@darknet.net | ICQ: 5113616
>> >> > DarkNet Online: http://www.darknet.net
>> >> >Digital Fusion: http://www.darknet.net/fusion
>> >> >
>> >> > -------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> > To leave this list, email <listserver@dallastexas.net>
>> >> > with the body text: leave keelynet
>> >> > WWW based join and leave forms and KeelyNet list archives
>> >> > are at http://dallastexas.net/keelynet/
>> >> > -------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> -------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> To leave this list, email <listserver@dallastexas.net>
>> >> with the body text: leave keelynet
>> >> WWW based join and leave forms and KeelyNet list archives
>> >> are at http://dallastexas.net/keelynet/
>> >> -------------------------------------------------------------
>> >
>> >--
>> >It is my opinion that we are being
>> >manipulated into a belief system
>> >which is reaching a critical point.
>> >Someone wants us to think a certain
>> >way, and things are being set up so
>> >we will follow that perception. It
>> >does not follow that the perception
>> >reflects the truth. It does not follow
>> >that the perception reflects the truth.
>> >
>> >-- Richard Hoagland
>> >
>> >---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >Don J. S. Adams
>> >Managing Consultant
>> >Microsoft
>> >Main Campus, Bldg 1
>> >Redmond, WA
>> >USA
>> >
>> >425-882-3431 USA
>> >403-998-4066 Canada
>> >
>> >http://www.intergate.bc.ca/business/rave
>> >
>> > -------------------------------------------------------------
>> > To leave this list, email <listserver@dallastexas.net>
>> > with the body text: leave keelynet
>> > WWW based join and leave forms and KeelyNet list archives
>> > are at http://dallastexas.net/keelynet/
>> > -------------------------------------------------------------
>> >
>>
>>
>> -------------------------------------------------------------
>> To leave this list, email <listserver@dallastexas.net>
>> with the body text: leave keelynet
>> WWW based join and leave forms and KeelyNet list archives
>> are at http://dallastexas.net/keelynet/
>> -------------------------------------------------------------
>