Jerry Wayne Decker wrote:
>
> Hi Don, JC et al!
>
> Man, and I thought I was far out!!!!...<g>......
>
> The comment about the Plasma wave being used by the Chinese scientist
> refers to a fascinating article in NEXUS magazine about a year ago
> where all kinds of genetic mutations and hybrids were created by
> melding tissue samples. The article is a bit unclear on the actual
> techniques, as well as in protocols that you could easily duplicate
> but there is enough for a start.
>
> Reminds me of Gurwiitch 'mitogenic rays' which he claimed use a UV
> carrier, so too does entomologist Phil Callahan find all kinds of
> nested frequencies used by insects and other life forms to
> communicate, sense and what else?? Gurwitch used I believe it was
> onions, one group had 'cancerous tumors', the other did not and was
> the control group. He used a sheet of regular window glass and a
> section of quartz as dividers between his test onion sample and the
> sample to be affected. He found that the cancerous onion when placed
> near a quartz panel would allow the mitogenic rays to pass through the
> quartz (indicating UV or higher freqs) to pass through and modulate
> the healthy sample so that it TOO became cancerous. The glass panel
> exposed to the same conditions, resulting in no cancer transmission
> signature to the test sample. He did this experiment over and over
> under various conditions to prevent other contact or exposure. So
> this plasma wave stuff has something to it and that's not even
> mentioning the spook aspects of radionics to analyze, duplicate and
> rebroadcast specific tuned signatures.
>
> Now, I knew a guy named Jorges Resines who lives in Brazil. He told
> me he had a radionics box that he connected to the input side of a
> small Tesla coil. He said he would hold his hand over the secondary
> output and could feel the 'quality' of the electric spark. Jorges
> said by adjusting the dials on the radionics box which alters the
> signature being produced, that you could feel distinct differences in
> the output of the Tesla coil voltage.
>
> The very idea of amulets, talismans and sigils is based on the
> blending together of various items together so that they produce a
> signature intended to alter the local reality.
>
> I really like the idea of an electronically repetitive mantra and I am
> told by a kind of 'spook' friend that this does work and he has used
> it for financial gain...<g>...of course, he has gone a lot further
> with some kind of phase locked stereo standing wave with a filter to
> mask out noise that detracts from his 'purpose'....but I don't have
> any useful details on the machine at this point.
>
> ---JCSnooky@aol.com wrote:
> >
> > Hello Don:
> > In a message dated 98-09-24 22:54:08 EDT, you write:
> >
> > << Ok,
> >
> > I've been thinking about Jerry's device on and off a fair bit.
> > The one that is constructed in the shape of a pyramid where
> > magnets are set in place and focus on a 'written' script which
> > details a desired outcome the user wishes realized.
> >
> > My initial take on this was that it smelled very much like voodoo
> > or witch craft. But as I said I was willing to keep an open mind
> and
> > listen
> > to other plausible explanations. A few folks offered these, some
> were
> > quite good, I take my hat off to John Berry's explanations for
> instance.
> >
> > However I still didnt feel like all bases were covered here, and in
> my
> > opinion
> > there didnt seem to be any way of arriving at a high level of
> confidence
> > that certain 'forces' which I seek to avoid might not be employed
> here.
> > There were numerable aspects of this experiment which seemed to
> indicate
> > dangerous waters to me.
> >
> > Then I began wondering about something else... could it be that
> these
> > 'subtle'
> > fields mentioned in the case of the pyramid might be of a morpogenic
> > nature?
> > IF so, what would mean?!
> >
> > I think... If Sheldrake is right about these m-fields existing and
> the
> > properties
> > he thinks they may have AND if this device is using only these
> > fields..then
> > there must be a way to test for this. Some how, some way, there
> must be
> > a
> > task or process that the device could be set to doing that results
> would
> > be consistent.
> > And repeatable. If the script is like unto software and the
> pyramid is
> > like unto hardware
> > and the motive force / medium / fuel is the m-field then wouldnt it
> > stand to reason
> > that this device could yield stable results that were directly
> > measurable?
> >
> > Recall that Sheldrake does imply that m-fields are consistent.
> They do
> > not change
> > much. He does not know what instantiated a given pattern / field
> per
> > se, but regarding
> > the fields constancy, this appears to be something he is certain
> about.
> >
> > Now then, if the device affects an m-field there should be both
> > localized and remote
> > phenomenon occuring. In fact if an m-field is being directly
> modified
> > there should
> > be some sort of 'dramatic' effect produced... I mean if you have a
> field
> > that is typically
> > constant and you start to tweak it then shouldnt there be some sort
> of
> > resulting stress
> > involved? A shear of some sort? I would refer the reader to the
> > excellent work done by
> > Penrose on what he refers to as 'hyperdimensional Twistors'.
> Strange
> > geometric forms
> > that underly time/space in some way. Oddly I find many of their
> > properties similiar in concept
> > to m-fields. Again, I do not know the dangers which may be
> inherent of
> > 'tweaking' physical
> > reality in this way. However in a conversation I had with James
> Bare
> > (of the Bare Rife Plasma
> > generator notoriety) some time ago, he states;
> >
> > >>DO NOT PLAY WITH THESE!!!!!!!!
> > >> I have some copies of an article where genetic traits were
> transferred
> > >>through a plasma field into chicken eggs. They were crossed with
> ducks -
> > got
> > >>chickens with semi webbed feet and duck bills.
> >
> > So in his opinion there may well be some very dangerous effects
> produced
> > here.
> >
> > On theother hand if the device employs what I would very loosely
> refer
> > to as paranormal
> > / spiritual energies, then as I stated before I have no desire to
> tinker
> > with it as I fear
> > the potential dangers could be far worse.
> >
> > But then again, what if m-fields were themselves in the realm of
> voodoo
> > and not science...
> > that would beg an entire set of new concerns in the context of this
> > posting...
>
> _________________________________________________________
> DO YOU YAHOO!?
> Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
-- It is my opinion that we are being manipulated into a belief system which is reaching a critical point. Someone wants us to think a certain way, and things are being set up so we will follow that perception. It does not follow that the perception reflects the truth. It does not follow that the perception reflects the truth.-- Richard Hoagland
---------------------------------------------------------------------Don J. S. AdamsManaging ConsultantMicrosoftMain Campus, Bldg 1Redmond, WAUSA
425-882-3431 USA403-998-4066 Canada