Thanks for the corrections.
You wrote;
> it only adds to the perception of free energy research as a bunch
of crazy crackpots who don't have their facts straight.
That goes for a lot of material on the web unfortunately...<g>...as
far as I know, no one has even attempted this fairly simple experiment
so it remains hypothetical despite the patent or claim, therefore even
at its best presentation, it is still not FACT...have to keep that one
in mind for a trial. We had some people with large strips of land who
said we could use it when we get ready...would be a cool experiment,
EVEN IF IT FAILS...with the advent of the new book by Vassilators
'Lost Science' from Borderlands at http://www.borderlands.com and his
excellent chapter on Stubblefield, it certainly lends credence to the
idea of tapping these varying waves of energy that circulate like
blood inside the planet..
---Philip Pesavento wrote:
>
> RE>>Prentice Patent
9/30/98
>
> I recently began to do further research on the Prentice Patent
listed on your
> web site. There are several errors in the information listed which
will
> prevent anyone from following up on it. First, the patent is a
Canadian
> patent, NOT a US patent. The patent number is correct for the
Canadian patent
> (253,765). The year for the patent is wrong, its 1925, NOT 1923.
Third, Mr.
> Prentice was a resident of Canada, not Pennsylvania when the patent
was filed.
> In a back issue of Borderlands (Vol. LIII, No. 1, 1st Quarter, 1997
page 19),
> this document is listed as a certified description, private
publication, not a
> patent, for the 1923 date. This might indicate that the origin of
some of the
> errors was in mixing up the earlier filing date with the patent
issue date. I
> do not know if Mr. Louis Roy accidentally or deliberately gave you
distorted
> info, but legitamate researchers will become frustrated resulting in
> increasing paranoia (cover-ups, conspiracies etc.) or declare the
info a
> fraud, which it doesn't deserve. I know you probably can't spend a
lot of time
> verifying files people send you, but it only adds to the perception
of free
> energy research as a bunch of crazy crackpots who don't have their
facts
> straight.
>
> --------------------------------------
> Date: 5/18/97 7:20 AM
> To: Philip Pesavento
> From: Jerry
> Hi Philip!
>
> What a unique and logical idea! Thanks for sharing it and I'll post
it
> asap...400,000 volts at 200,000 amps, geez, thats a lot of juice.
>
> There has long been speculation about tapping into lightning but the
> highly explosive electrical forces would simply blow a storage
battery
> all to hell, unless it was a superconducting ring.....on the BBS,
there
> was reference made to something called 'liquid electricity' which
turned
> out to be a superconducting deWar flask that could be charged with
large
> volumes of electrical power....based on tests, it was determined
that a
> tube the size of the Washington monument would power the nation for a
> year once it was charged....a pint bottle would power your house for
a
> year...
>
> Tapping of atmospheric energy has always fascinated me as has large
value
> dielectrics (to store gradual accumulations of this power). Thank
you
> for the paper, I will also add your email so people can respond to
you
> directly...I know some people prefer private communications to
transfer
> information they either would rather not be associated with or that
is
> not for public consumption.....seeya!
> --
_________________________________________________________
DO YOU YAHOO!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com