Re: Gyromagnetic ratio
Meat Truck ( (no email) )
Sun, 27 Sep 1998 06:52:21 -0500
----------
> From: Meat Truck <mnorris@akron.infi.net>
> To: freenrg-l@eskimo.com; keeelynet@dallastexas.net
> Subject: Gyromagnetic ratio
> Date: Sunday, September 27, 1998 5:01 AM
>
> Another amazing Faraday observation; the magnetic lines of force do not
> seem to follow a rotation parallel to its magnetic field. That is to say
if
> a cylinder is magnetized so that north and south poles are made on the
> ends,and the cylinder is then rotated about its cylindrical axis, the
lines
> of force still appear stationary. This is supposedly due to the cohered
> ferromagnetic spins tilting to accommodate in a gyroscopic way to the
added
> angular momentum introduced upon the system. This ratio for different
> magnetic materials is then termed the gyromagnetic ratio. This raises the
> inverse question; what would then occur if the sample were magnetized
> similarly while in cylindrical rotation. Would the "imprint" of angular
> momentum change the resultant gyromagnetic ratio? Is it not so far
fetched
> to imagine that rollers composed strictly of strontium ferrite could be
> placed between aluminum rings to establish a capacity? This ceramic
> material offers the possibility of amplifying both the electric and
> magnetic fields. Imagine if you will that an alternating potential is
> placed across the rings accompanied by a simultaneous alternating
magnetic
> field at right angles through the rollers. The Lorentz interaction of the
> AC inputs will cause rotation of the rollers by theory. Book 1b of Searl
> work suggests "We cannot at this stage state that a one material class
will
> work the same as that of a multi-compound system that Searl uses. Only a
> real research program could identify if this were possible...it may well
be
> so..." It would seem to me that this is misleading in that the cost of a
> single element system must be far less costly. People may not readily
> glimpse what I am implying but if two AC signals can cause rotation of
an
> unmagnetized ferrite roller then at some time in the picture when the
> fields are sufficiently scaled up enough in strength by making
increasingly
> larger and larger prototypes the point should theoretically be reached
> whereby enough mmf will exist so that the ferrite rollers could be
> magnetized in rotation with an alternating current input. I realize that
> this idea is not the norm but how else or what better way to explain how
a
> substance could be magnetized with an alternating current imprint? This
> idea has taken awhile but in an earlier post I reffered to a magnetic
> cement in which the curing time was intended to be subjected to the same
> circumstances. A unique way of imprinting? Lets hope time will tell.
> Sincere in the work, H Norris mnorris@akron.infi.net