OK.. here.. http://www.padrak.com/ine/SEARL1.html
Now tell me.. your interpretation.. Was this a DEMO? Or.. what it a
purported demo... Is there something there? Now this was 1996..
so I would think.. we would be hearing more about this..IF it worked.
v/r Ken
>Hi Tayfun,
>
>You miss the point of my arguement completely. I know John Searl has a
>theory, I know he has been talking about his ideas for decades now and I
>know he has a huge group of faithful followers.
>
>I believe I have a right to question all and everything in my world, Searl
>is no exception. We involved the F/E search have been host to countless
>individual's claims and theories over the years. I have investigated many
>of these claims as part of my own search for answers. John Searl has been
>making claims in this area for longer than most. He has even inspired many
>to search for answers to these energy problems. But the fact remains that
>he has never come forward with a single demonstration of his proof of
>principal. All the theories in the world and all the talk in the world mean
>nothing (in this instance) compared to one single physical demonstration of
>the principal involved. A theory that can not be applied, no matter how
>beautiful it may appear, is of no practical importance to those involved
>with an applied physics. This is my point entirely, and this is my
>arguement against John Searl - nothing more or less - it has not and it
>will not, it seems, be addressed by Searl or his supporters. Why?
>
>You say that John Searl has been granted a professorship by a university.
>Which one and for what? I do not consider this a rude question, I have
>friends and aquaintances that are academics and they never take offence to
>questions of where and for what they received their qualifications. Would
>you agree?
>
>If we can not question those that require our efforts and/or support (as
>John Searl certainly does) then we are being asked to make blind decisions
>based on faith and trust. I prefer to retain responsibility for my life and
>actions (as I believe we all should) and I question the motives of anyone
>attempting to undermine that personal responsibility in any way. I believe
>everyone has the right to question, particularly when another is asking
>them for trust and faith. Questions make us strong, and allow us to make
>informed decisions. Blind faith places our life and future and
>responsibilities in grave jeopardy.
>
>Just as I invited Dennis to substantiate his support for Searl, I also
>invite you to question and substantiate your support for Searl's vision
>with something more than theoretical meanderings. It may be enough for you
>to have a 'good feeling' about Searl's claims, but unsubstantiated
>feel-good claims are not enough for me, I'm afraid.
>
>As I have said before, Searl has had decades to back up his claims with
>some small physical proof. You would'nt nessessarily believe me if I made
>great claims with no proof - would you? It's not hard to do, you know.
>Beautiful theories grow on tree's <g>.
>
>Regards, Bill.
>
>P.S. If you are a supporter of John Searl, which is of course your absolute
>right, I ask only that you question and understand your faith and trust -
>in the absence of any physical evidence.
>
>
>At 21:39 24/09/98 +0100, Tayfun KOCAK wrote:
>>As someone who personally know Prof. Searl it amazes me to hear so much
>>rubbish about him and his work. If only 1000 of you gave as much as he has
>>done then the world would be a different place to live for the better.
>>
>>Most people are totally unable to grasp the theory of the SEG technology
>>which is based on the squares and does not have a bloody clue to their
>>significance. He has given you the public this knowledge, the theory and
>>the way he used to build the power generator, through his books. How many
>>of you read the books? How many of you have the scientific background to
>>understand what he is talking about? Most people want everything on a plate
>>- and they still fail to see it when it is given to them!
>>
>>If he was a fraudster then how the hell does a University give him the
>>title of Professor? Does any of you know the procedure for getting it?
>>
>>I have a few simple questions to ask. What right or justification do you
>>people think you have in knowing what Prof. Searl is doing? What
>>contribution have you made to humanity or the SEG? What is it to you?
>>
>>T. Kocak
>>
>>PS. If you are a supporter of Prof. Searl please excuse the tone of my
>>e-mail.
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------
> To leave this list, email <listserver@dallastexas.net>
> with the body text: leave keelynet
> WWW based join and leave forms and KeelyNet list archives
> are at http://dallastexas.net/keelynet/
> -------------------------------------------------------------