>BTW I have found that the hand positions are not critical but the hands must
>be placed above the object for this to work. Perhaps the distance of the
>hands above the object is relative. Maybe at a certain distance more weight
>is negated than at another.
Have you tried placing your hands close to and moving them away until you
get the effect? (or the other way around, i'm not sure where the position
is) If the distance required for people of different weights varies
*consistently*, that would show correllation between weight and hand
distance. If it varies randomly, there's something else entirely at work,
and if it's constant, then i would expect it to correllate somehow with
some other bodily field's radius..