Precisely, we need aether scopes, aether multimeters and aether
imaging tools. This would let us see whether our experiments were
making any perceptible changes and open entirely new worlds of
understanding by being able to see the inflows.
---JCSnooky@aol.com wrote:
>
> Hey, Jerry et al:
>
> Jerry, in your opinion, I abide. ('Aether' you agree, or you don't!)
>
> In the famous (or infamous, depending on your p.o.v.) Michelson-Morley
> experiment of 1887 the existence of the aether was supposedly
disproved.
> According to the best minds of the those days, using the parameters
of the
> experiment, a fringe-shift should hve been observeable if the aether
existed.
>
> But why should this be so? The aether is fine-matter (almost more
fine and
> subtle than we can imagine). One wouldn't attempt to weigh a flea
using a
> truck scale, would she? I admit, this is quite a clumsy analogy,
but you get
> the point, don't you?
>
> To prove (or disprove) the existence of something as fine as the
aether, we
> need to come up with much better experiments--and much better
measuring
> devices.
>
> JC Snooky
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------
> To leave this list, email <listserver@dallastexas.net>
> with the body text: leave keelynet
> WWW based join and leave forms and KeelyNet list archives
> are at http://dallastexas.net/keelynet/
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
_________________________________________________________
DO YOU YAHOO!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com