You make some interesting and valid points. Thanks for sharing
your perspectives
Matthew Redmond wrote:
>
> My, oh my, this subject hit the nerves of some people. So what seems to be
> the problem? To be honest I am not 100% sure about the spiritual world, nor
> am 100% disbelieving. But how many people in todays scientific comunity are
> 100% sure of free energy/antigravity/teleportation/etc...
>
> What Jerry seems to believe he has is a method of altering the percentage of
> probablilty for events in the future. There can be many reasons that this
> is occuring, reasons from near logical to the increadably weird. We should
> not forget that increadably weird sometimes wins.
>
> My own thoughts are this. If it works, then we have no idea WHY it works
> for sure. It is for this reason that I too must say that we should be
> cautious, that goes for all things in this little realm of science (aether
> tapping etc). It may turn out that the effect is totally natural and we
> have nothing to worry about, however, what if it isn't, what if we do have
> something to worry about? Yes by all means experiment, I am not saying
> that "because it MAY BE bad we should not do it", more like "yes do it, but
> be careful what you wish for." The reasons things work may be physical,
> spiritual or both, just because one does not believe in the other one should
> not discount it.
>
> Matthew.
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------
> To leave this list, email <listserver@dallastexas.net>
> with the body text: leave keelynet
> WWW based join and leave forms and KeelyNet list archives
> are at http://dallastexas.net/keelynet/
> -------------------------------------------------------------