Re: New Devices for new opportunities

Chuck Henderson ( (no email) )
Mon, 14 Sep 1998 12:04:28 -0500

Hi Jerry and Folks!

I remember in my youth <G> that it was fun to get a small
amount of mercury, usually from a thermometer, and turn
dirty old pennies into what looked like shiny new "steel"
pennies. They had the appearence of having been chromed.
The mercury would bond with the surface of the copper.

Now, I have no idea as to how the mercury will react with
the composition of the magnet, but if you get a simular
bond, it many serve as a conduct cement to hold the wire
in place.

It doesn't require there to be a large quantity mercury
held in the slot like a reservoir, does it?

Later...

Chuck...

----------
> From: Jerry W. Decker <jdecker@keelynet.com>
> To: KeelyNet@DallasTexas.net
> Subject: New Devices for new opportunities
> Date: Monday, September 14, 1998 12:53 AM
>
> Hi Folks!
>
> I've been thinking about those deep dielectric capacitors that were
> posted by Bob Paddock in the message;
>
> http://dallastexas.net/keelynet/archive/00001004.htm
>
> and in the high density magnets posted by Don Adams in message;
>
> http://dallastexas.net/keelynet/archive/00000935.htm
>
> It seems a lot of free energy devices rely on either capacitors or
> magnets or a combination of the two. These exceedingly powerful new
> devices might offer a chance for success with some new experiments.
>
> Perrigo and Moray with atmospheric taps using the minimal resistance of
> deep dielectrics to store the accumulated charge, then dump it into
> other such deep dielectrics. Possibly successive discharges in vacuum
> to extract the collected energy from the capacitors.
>
> And the mythical Sweet device that uses 'tickled' tuned magnets....as I
> understand it, flipping the poles back and forth at the bloch wall to
> induce current in associated coils.
>
> There is also the DePalma report, in Playboy of all places, where he
> related a Faraday experiment using a depression cut into the end of a
> cylinder magnet and filled with mercury to provide conduction.
>
> A single wire was touched to the mercury and the magnet slowly spun. He
> said large currents come from this. I think it was the basis for
> DePalmas homopolar motor experiments.
>
> I've not read any reports of anyone covering the thing with a cap or
> shaped depression so that the mercury would not escape as it was
> rotated. The unit I saw that DePalma built was mounted in a plexiglas
> box and hung from chains. He did not show it in operation.
>
> Since flux lines join at the poles of magnets and are thus denser per
> volume of space, it would seem a series of shaped wires which would be
> excited by the rotating field would produce more power.
>
> The thing about touching the magnet produces the low voltage and high
> current of the homopolar motors. Don Lancaster is of the opinion that
> the sparks and heating simply kill any possible chance of anything
> anomalous as he has written about on his website http://www.tinaja.com
>
> These new devices might well offer opportunities if we'd look at them
> with a fresh perspective.
> --
> Jerry Wayne Decker / jdecker@keelynet.com
> http://keelynet.com / "From an Art to a Science"
> Voice : (214) 324-8741 / FAX : (214) 324-3501
> KeelyNet - PO BOX 870716 - Mesquite - Republic of Texas - 75187
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------
> To leave this list, email <listserver@dallastexas.net>
> with the body text: leave keelynet
> WWW based join and leave forms and KeelyNet list archives
> are at http://dallastexas.net/keelynet/
> -------------------------------------------------------------