Re: pyramid device

Jerry W. Decker ( (no email) )
Sun, 13 Sep 1998 13:29:46 -0500

Hi Don et al!

This post about the pyramid device was intended as an answer to Steve
about some experiments I had done, so I figured I would share them with
the list. Most of the info had already been posted many months ago as
to dimensions and arrangements.

Two comments have been made, one that there is 'karma' involved, the
other that it is 'witchcraft'.

The experiments have worked for me and that's all I am claiming. I can'
say they would work for anyone else though I do konw others who they
have worked for. Well, let's just say they didn't think they could do
what they wanted, but it happened after they setup the pyramid or tried
other 'possible' reality altering devices.

IMO, karma is a way of teaching us based on our free will decisions
about which path we THINK we should take. Most of the writings I've
seen about making such requests is that you don't DEMAND anything, but
you ask if its possible and in harmony then let it happen when it is
propitious.

To my mind, I view it complex dynamic frequencies which intertwine,
collide and augment each other...so its a matter of phasing your request
into the mix in such a way that it does not negatively interfere and in
fact, that it not only positively interfere, but do so in the largest
possible way....a kind of chaos linkage where a butterfly wing beating
in the Caribbean affects the path of a hurrican half way round the
earth. Therefore, karma to my mind is your own personal crap shoot with
destiny.

Now as to the claim of 'witchcraft'. Call it what you may but occult
means hidden and there is no doubt in my mind that people who dabble in
such subjects realize there are ways to influence reality by certain
combinations of elements, certain timings and certain ways of thinking
or directing thought while in an emotional state. But that is far
removed from the simple pyramid experiment which I have used
successfully and was passing on to Steve.

Quantifiable science......well, we should include Qualifiable also.
Numbers aren't everything and I think some things just aren't measurable
beyond the criteria of 'did it work for you?'.

The digital age has skewed our collective perception away from the
reality of nature. The universe IS ANALOG and I think there is a world
of possibilities in this that could make some fantastic products and
technologies.

We are so hooked on digital this, digital that. Remember we have to
sample ANALOG levels to derive all this digital mess.

Don't get me wrong, I am far from a Luddite, but I think this idea that
if it can't be 'quantified' as in precisely measured, then it doesn't
work because it can't be measured in discrete steps.

My qualifier is does it work. You fiddle with it til you can make it
work as often and reliably as possible, THEN you try to quantify all the
steps that occur in a working system in hopes of consistent replication
for commercial use. Natural, original science uses qualifiers, modern,
commercially repeatable science uses quantifiers once it has been
qualified.

Now, what the heck does that have to do with attempts at reality biasing
using a pyramid? Well, a lot because I haven't had 100% successes and
the cases that have worked could just as well have worked had I NOT used
the pyramid. Though in several of those cases, every indication was I
was 'borderline' as to having what I needed to get what I wanted, in
other cases, people had no prior history or problems which only appeared
AFTER the pyramid use.

It is EXPERIENTIAL. It costs almost nothing to do the experiment and
you might have something unusual happen in your life. The terms don't
really matter about witchcraft, karma, etc...only that you achieve
results. Try it, hot glue and dowel rods, an 8 year old could do it.

Something else of interest, a friend was very concerned because of a big
conference that was being planned in her town and which included many
speakers she had wanted to bring in for her group. She was told that if
she put the paperwork about the planned event in a tray of water, then
freeze it, that the event would be 'frozen. Sure enough, about two
weeks later or so, the event was completely called off for some reason
and not attempted again. My friend has never removed the ice tray and
there has been no further talk of such an event in this area.

Another time the owner of the house she was renting and quite
comfortable in suddenly, after about 8 years decided to sell it. She
was very upset about it and wrote it down on paper, then froze the paper
as in the earlier episode. Within 3 months, the owner had changed her
mind and the house remained available for rent.

As I understand it is a kind of 'sympathy' where the idea of cold and
ice means to slow and stop actions. Its' not so much the actual ACT as
the INTENT and EXECUTION that somehow modulates or biases reality to
accomodate your needs.

I think people like Daniel up in Canada who can do the most incredible
things with simple wire and wood, such as powering a TV and a 1/2 hp
motor underwater with no batteries or outside power sources.

It is an application of shaman-like abilities to the hardware proofs we
need. Such claims have been directed at Keely and others, saying the
machines won't work unless they are near or touching it. Perhaps.

That is why we have to look at such areas. I am told some people can
sense the flow of magnetic and electric fields with their hands. If
there is a linkage between aether, gravity, magnetism and electricity,
then an ability to see these interactions would definitely help in the
development of a circuit geometry that could accumulate, collimate and
allow the use of this energy to do work.

Finally, these tuned, signatured pyramid bubbles do, in my direct
experience seem to have some ability to bias events in your favor,
within reason of course. The only way I know of testing something with
so many possible inputs is to determine the end result you want and see
if you achieve it within a reasonable period. Like so much of on the
Internet, it can be argued to death, but nothing beats the actual simple
experiment that YOU do to see if YOU get results that are meaningful to
YOU. All I said was that it HAS worked for me and if anyone has any
issues with it, do it yourself and then lets talk.

What I would like to see is people trying it, perhaps posting in a
public forum what they are trying to do (no names or specifics beyond
general expectation), then doing the pyramid thing, then IF their
desired event happens, to post the results and how long it took. It
would be interesting to see a wide range of experiments with the results
and see if we can see any kind of pattern...this also would include your
protocols (as in size of pyramid, construction info, use of magnets or
crystals, any unusual/special setup, etc..)...but that's up to you
folks. I'll continue to use them when I feel they might give me an
'edge'...

--            Jerry Wayne Decker  /   jdecker@keelynet.com         http://keelynet.com   /  "From an Art to a Science"      Voice : (214) 324-8741   /   FAX :  (214) 324-3501   KeelyNet - PO BOX 870716 - Mesquite - Republic of Texas - 75187