Thanks for that fascinating report on electrically stimulated water!!!
You wrote;
> "Water passes through a valve covered with electrodes. Electric
> shocks transform matter. Water thus catalyzed has the same
> properties as a detergent."
You know I remember reading how years ago, to provide water in remote
regions, the US ARMY had a high intensity electric shock system that
they used in ponds. The claim was it not only killed microorganisms but
made the water very healthy to drink, all it required was filtration.
Big electrodes were placed in the water and zapped to cleanse it.
And a friend told me a few years ago about a fellow in Kentucky,
Georgia, somewhere in the South (and I wrote it up a couple of times on
KeelyNet, probably as email) who had this huge tank that he filled with
dirty water. He would zap it with very high voltage, high current
electricity, the water would 'polarize' and all contaminants and toxic
material would be literally shock squeezed out of the water, as well as
purifying it so it could be drank. This one didn't even require
filtration as the contaminants sank to the bottom and were sucked out of
the tank for removal. The guy who told me this said the water was found
to have healing effects and when a dog with severe mange was bathed in
it, his skin healed up, the mange went away and the dog had a healthy
coat of hair. Other reports were about sores and skin problems as well
as benefit when taken internally.
Now I'd kind of shelved that but your post made me remember it...thanks!
In your comments, you wrote;
> Now, if an industrial giant like Daewoo gets into the act,
> the whole field could reach a new level of recognition. High time!
True, such a large company with global distribution will certainly serve
to draw attention to these alt tech claims and how they can be developed
and marketed...its a millenial thing ya know...<g>..
Anyway, your comments were at least as useful and informative as the
engendering report....we certainly need more like this...<g>..
At one time we had discussions, perhaps not here, about water surface
tension and the bonding of the water molecule, whether it was more
healthy to ingest water with a high surface tension or a low one.
The majority of what I have seen indicate a low surface tension is best
because it is easier for the cells to break up and ingest the water.
Though some claim a higher surface tension is more beneficial.
Similar confusion abounds with the pH of water, 7.0 being neutral(?) and
some saying water that is +7 (more alkaline) is better for you since it
alters the pH of your fluids.
Now the Carey Reems technique relies on monitoring urine and saliva
daily to ensure a specific pH that prevents the formation and growth of
cancer cells, at least as I understand it.
I've never heard a bad report about the Reems process and many claim
amazing healings. It is a long and laborious process where you can only
eat certain foods and drink lots of juices that keep the pH in control,
so it is possible there is something to this.
At any rate, there is one final comment about the detergent effect, the
very process of lowering surface tension by use of chemical
'surfactants' allows detergents to more easily release dirt, grease and
grime since the molecules are not so tightly bound.
I just love it that this could be a new type of washing machine that
requires no soap...next will be Star Trek sonic type baths that use no
fluid whatsoever....don't know if I would like that as I revel in
showers and baths..<g>...not only is it enervating but you feel so clean
afterwards, so I'd probably be old fashioned about bathing as a personal
relic that I'd rather not discard in favor of the 'new-fangled' cleaning
method....thanks Jean!
-- Jerry Wayne Decker / jdecker@keelynet.com http://keelynet.com / "From an Art to a Science" Voice : (214) 324-8741 / FAX : (214) 324-3501 KeelyNet - PO BOX 870716 - Mesquite - Republic of Texas - 75187