The technical details have to be worked out, right geometry, velocity
and all that, but I think the thing relates to the change in viscosity
of the cooking oil as it heats up 'hyrdosonically' from the high speed
motion through the device. The magic velocity as I understood it was
from 1800 to 2200 rpm and the unit had to run for a period under
outside power until the heating effect had been achieved....it stands
to reason that if this heat thing is so, you should be able to heat
the oil to whatever level would initiate the self-running effect.
Note he did have a heat sink to keep the oil from burning up, so in my
opinion the device seems to be a kind of heat pump, using this
internally generated heat to produce the power when it cools....
In some respects, this heat is analogous to voltage or pressure that
builds up. Since nature seeks equilibrium at all times, the heat
bleeds off into the ambient and in its flow can be tapped. Just as
high voltage or current, once accumulated and released will seek to
spread out over the widest surface area to achieve electrical
equilibrium.
Again, it is analogous to a waterwheel being pushed by water from a
river which is of course being PUSHED by gravity as it either flows
down a waterfall or from a higher elevation to sea level.
So, in the case of the Clem and Schauberger and even this new
zpe@pdq.net claim, I think the trick is this heat to cold natural
flow...there is more to this which I think will really set off some
experiments, perhaps the zpe@pdq.net folks will be the first to show
the desktop proof of principle...but after reading the site, I am very
disappointed because of the tease nature of it...the
researcher/discoverer was not named nor was any description of the
basic principle that would allow others to at least prove the claim.
However, it is up to each person or group how they choose to release,
share or sell their info. For KeelyNet, you have what we have, or
will when I get it posted..<g>...sometimes life gets in the way of
wants...
Garry, there is a file on the CEACU which is a direct ripoff of CLEM
and does not credit him. Be aware that CEACU was NEVER BUILT, only
theorized by the author. I have to give him credit though for making
an excellent case for the probable success of operation of such a
unit, though personally I would stick with Clem since he DID BUILD IT
according to all I've been able to find out to date in Dallas.
I think the hydraulic coupling which lets the fluid move from the
fixed connector to the rotating shaft was found for around $140 by a
guy I met at a conference a year ago. I've seen him on the net
since but haven't had a chance to collect any info. I'm sure there
are several sources for such a connection as it seemed to be the
hardest thing to find.
The other part will be the cone shape. In discussions about this,
there appear to be several approaches to the tube feeds on the cone;
1) it might be possible to solder tubes onto a cone shaped form.
2) an outside cone cover could be laid over a grooved cone and
tightly sealed so the fluid must traverse the helical path,
If you look into the work of Schauberger, specifically his research
with 'twistor tubes', you will find an intriguing experiment which he
demonstrated at a local high school. As I understand it, the setup
involved a single pump which was used to pump water through three
different pipes and the speed and pressure of the outgoing water from
each pipe was measured.
The claim is one of the tubes was straight glass, one was copper, the
other was a glass twistor tube created by Schauberger and using his
KUDU antelope spiral pattern.
If I recall this correctly, the claim said that the water moving
through the copper tube was faster than through the straight glass
tube, but the water through the glass twistor tube was supposed to be
moving so fast it was sucking the pump dry....
So, that twistor angle would be one way to ensure and possibly
optimize this design...perhaps someone here has those angles...I used
to know a guy in Kansas who knew it and built several models ot if to
help visualizing the flows...
BTW, there is something called 'flow forms' which claims to enervate
and energize life, from the images I've seen, it looks like cascades
of fluid that look strangely like the pulse pump of Tesla (patented).
Schauberger claimed this twistor, imploding flow was very life giving
and natural, producing cold as a side effect. And on and on...<g>....
Well, good luck and I congratulate you on wanting to build it, perhaps
some of us could send you some bucks to help, god knows, I've blown
more over the years that just resulted in nothing...time for some kind
of hardware testing and you 'be the man'...
=================
---Garry Whitman wrote:
>
> I am new to the list but not to the list's topics .
> Upon careful study of Joseph Newman’s book and construction of a small
> prototype it dawned on me that using Newsman’s own figures it was
much much
> cheaper to buy electricity than pay for all that copper and get
electricity
> free.
> So... I have been following the discussion of the Clem engine
closely. With
> my machine tools, access to a gray iron foundry, long history of red
neck
> engineering, and a little spare time this engine could be built for
less
> than five hundred dollars. The problem is with my lack of
understanding of
> the basic theory behind this engine. I have an electronics
background and
> have built many devices over the years. If someone can give me a one
page
> answer as to why this might work, that makes sense to me, then I will
> build this engine and report on it's progress and testing.
> Garry Whitman
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------
> To leave this list, email <listserver@dallastexas.net>
> with the body text: leave keelynet
> WWW based join and leave forms and KeelyNet list archives
> are at http://dallastexas.net/keelynet/
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
_________________________________________________________
DO YOU YAHOO!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com