Re: Dotto ring: Success

crowekri ( (no email) )
Thu, 6 Aug 1998 00:41:04 -0500

That would be great. No rush whenever you can get to it. If you don't
remember I was the guy asking about the Hamel spinner a few months back.
That was the first device I ever built and I am glad since it worked just as
it was claimed to by Mr. Hamel. I have worked on the spinner for some time
now performing different tests and reviewing the saucer design at JLNaudins
site and believe that Mr. Hamel may be headed in the right direction. I
have my own ideas on a propulsion device that is kind of a hybrid of the
Hamel spinner and David Cowlishaw's GIT but I need to work out the total
design before constructing a test model. Anyway just wanted to thankyou
again for this great service you are providing.
crowekri
-----Original Message-----
From: Jerry W. Decker <jdecker@keelynet.com>
To: KeelyNet Discussion List <KeelyNet@DallasTexas.net>
Date: Wednesday, August 05, 1998 10:57 PM
Subject: Re: Dotto ring: Success

>Hi!
>
>Great! That is EXCEEDINGLY CHEAP for that kind of material...just be
>careful, it would suck if you got sick or cancer from messing with the
>dotto ring....I'll have to post the complete info that isn't in the
>patent, maybe that will help as it has the details and the modulation
>freq and why...good luck!
>--
> Jerry Wayne Decker / jdecker@keelynet.com
> http://keelynet.com / "From an Art to a Science"
> Voice : (214) 324-8741 / FAX : (214) 324-3501
> KeelyNet - PO BOX 870716 - Mesquite - Republic of Texas - 75187
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------
> To leave this list, email <listserver@dallastexas.net>
> with the body text: leave keelynet
> WWW based join and leave forms and KeelyNet list archives
> are at http://dallastexas.net/keelynet/
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>