Keely Net Mail List: Inertial Drives

------=_NextPart_000_0039_01BDA469.68A977E0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi All,
Here we are again with inertial drives. I have seen some posts =
recently regarding this method. Just want to say that I do think that =
inertial drives ( a REAL one ) is the way to go for antigravity, and I =
would be pleased to see people from this group to start a collaborating =
effort on making this a reality. By this I mean that we start with plans =
and ideas of a design which does the following:

1- Creates an imbalanced center of mass using rotation/gyros
2- *important* CANCEL'S OUT the reaction forces.

I have been concentrating with this issue of inertial drives since =
sometime now, and have got quite a few ideas and design advancements =
which will hopefully share with the list when I have it planned out. =
What I want to emphasize is the models that are out there, specifically =
the GIT. This simple doesn't work as some people think because of one =
single very important reason : there is a reaction force which goes =
against the proposed direction of resultant force ( point number 2 ). =
Now people might ask how come it works when put in the water. Well if =
you see the pictures of some of these experiments you can see that there =
are Ripples ( waves ) generated by the device on the surface of the =
water. Well now remember how a propeller worked ? it pushed ( or pulls ) =
water in order for it to move. We have the same situation, the devices =
vibrates and has a vertical vibrational component which generates these =
waves which in turn "PUSH" the device forward ( or the direction it =
moves for that matter ).

But don't get me wrong, the inertial device is the way to go, as I =
beleive prof Laithwaite managed to do ( check out =
http://home.dmv.com/~tbastian/gyro.htm) which I think is the single best =
document that I have ever come across regarding this matter. Apart from =
this the only devices which allegedly work are the ones in =
http://www.supersymmetry.com and the lorrey drive, but ofcourse these =
are just allegations and are secret patents.

Anyhow, I just wanted to clarify the point about some of the GIT =
experiments people are doing and claim that it is working. Infact if you =
put any device that wobbles into water it will move into a certain =
direction.

I also want to call on the mathematicians and people into practical =
physics to get something going with regard to a simple basic design =
based on the works of Laithwaite, we could even try to duplicate some of =
his work.

------=_NextPart_000_0039_01BDA469.68A977E0
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Here we are again =with=20inertial drives. I have seen some posts recently regarding this method. =Just=20want to say that I do think that inertial drives ( a REAL one ) is the =way to go=20for antigravity, and I would be pleased to see people from this group to =start a=20collaborating effort on making this a reality. By this I mean that we =start with=20plans and ideas of a design which does the following:

I have been =concentrating=20with this issue of inertial drives since sometime now, and have got =quite a few=20ideas and design advancements which will hopefully share with the list =when I=20have it planned out. What I want to emphasize is the models that are out =there,=20specifically the GIT. This simple doesn't work as some people think =because of=20one single very important reason : there is a reaction force which goes =against=20the proposed direction of resultant force ( point number 2 ). Now people =might=20ask how come it works when put in the water. Well if you see the =pictures of=20some of these experiments you can see that there are Ripples ( waves ) =generated=20by the device on the surface of the water. Well now remember how a =propeller=20worked ? it pushed ( or pulls ) water in order for it to move. We have =the same=20situation, the devices vibrates and has a vertical vibrational component =which=20generates these waves which in turn "PUSH" the device forward =( or the=20direction it moves for that matter ).

But don't get me =wrong, the=20inertial device is the way to go, as I beleive prof Laithwaite managed =to do (=20check out http://home.dmv.com/~tbas=tian/gyro.htm)=20which I think is the single best document that I have ever come across =regarding=20this matter. Apart from this the only devices which allegedly work are =the ones=20in http://www.supersymmetry.com =and=20the lorrey drive, but ofcourse these are just allegations and are secret =patents.

Anyhow, I just =wanted to=20clarify the point about some of the GIT experiments people are doing and =claim=20that it is working. Infact if you put any device that wobbles into water =it will=20move into a certain direction.

I also want to =call on the=20mathematicians and people into practical physics to get something going =with=20regard to a simple basic design based on the works of Laithwaite, we =could even=20try to duplicate some of his work.