>You ask about Danforth, I don't know anything about him.
=46rom Sri Lanka AFAIK. I have no idea what (if any) relationship=20
he had with Meyer. There was an Aus Free Energy mag back in the
early nineties called "Tuning In" (published by Ian Hacon) which
ran a couple of articles on the Meyer stuff and which also described
Danforth's setup. I never saw any follow-up though, on his results,
if any. I came across the article (along with a couple of KeelyNet
files on Meyer (Meyer1.txt, Meyer2.txt), and four of Meyer's patents)=20
on the Internet a year or so back but the site is no longer there=20
<gloom>. I did download copies of the files though so, if you're=20
interested, I can zip 'em up and attach them to you.
>You ask if anyone here has knowledge of anyone who has tried to
>duplicate Stan Meyers experiments with fractioning water...I don't know
>of anyone...from what I've read, there has never been enough information
>on how to conduct the experiment...patents are about as detailed as it
>gets with Meyer....surely SOMEONE has at least tried it??
Meyer's patent # 4,936,961 seems to be fairly explicit about the
mechanical setup - construction of the cell etc - and probably=20
enough to reproduce the electronics with a bit of experimentation.
I intend to try sometime. Certainly Danforth's article gives enough
detail to be reproduceable but it differs considerably from Meyer's
patents and there was no further information that I ever came across
as to whether Danforth's rig actually worked.
Something else which may tie in - I believe there is an article on
KeelyNet somewhere dealing with a scientist who had a hefty=20
ultrasonic transducer at the bottom of a column of water - when he
hit a critical frequency (somewhat above 40 kHz) the column of water
took off straight up, through the roof and headed for scenes unknown.
I don't have it to hand but you may remember the article.
alan