RE: Draining ether holes

Matthew Redmond ( (no email) )
Sat, 1 Aug 1998 10:12:33 +1200

Woops...sent it too myself...no wonder I got confused.

=AB=BB=AB=BB=AB=BB=AB=BB=AB=BB=AB=BB=AB=BB=AB=BB=AB=BB=AB=BB=AB=BB=AB=BB=AB=
=BB=AB=BB=AB=BB=AB=BB=AB=BB=AB=BB=AB=BB=AB=BB=AB=BB=AB=BB=AB=BB=AB=BB=AB=BB=
=AB=BB=AB=BB=AB=BB

-----Original Message-----
From: Matthew Redmond [mailto:adze@clear.net.nz]
Sent: Friday, 31 July 1998 18:54
To: Matthew Redmond
Subject: RE: Draining ether holes

Let me explain this a bit better...

=3D=3D=3D=3D

....were they destroyed, hidden (if so they considered them more
sacred than
their kings and queens!), or were made up. IMHO I do not think the
egyptions would just make something up, especially something that
looks like
THAT.

=3D=3D=3D=3D

What I meant was that if we haven't "found" a hidding place for these
devices (if one exists), but we have found the burial chambers of
the kings
and queens of ancient egypt, then that may mean that these devices were
concidered either more sacred than their rulers, or that we are looking i=
n
the wrong place.

Also, these diagrams may not be "exact" drawings of what the devices were
like. I mean, what if they were drawn YEARS after they were last seen.
They could be drawings of what once was. That could explain a
snake in the
centre of the container, was just a story representation of what
the "COIL"
looked like...for example...

"the transparent cage held captive a coiled snake which spat and
hissed when
ordered by the high priests (one of which had control of the magic light
socket"

oh well...

MatthewR.

=AB=BB=AB=BB=AB=BB=AB=BB=AB=BB=AB=BB=AB=BB=AB=BB=AB=BB=AB=BB=AB=BB=AB=BB=AB=
=BB=AB=BB=AB=BB=AB=BB=AB=BB=AB=BB=AB=BB=AB=BB=AB=BB=AB=BB=AB=BB=AB=BB=AB=BB=
=AB=BB=AB=BB=AB=BB