Re: Bradley - Orgone

Chuck Henderson ( (no email) )
Thu, 30 Jul 1998 00:07:48 -0500

Hi Don, Bradley, & Folks!

I would suggest that for an unbiased approach to Orgonomy, I
look to the Public Orgonomic Research Exchange (P.O.R.E.)
website at "http://www.orgone.org" and it's numerous links to
other sites. There is a link at PORE to the Wilhelm Reich Museum
Bookstore where you can get Reich's actual writings and not
someone's interpretation of his work. This will give you a foundation
to build on. While I'm not certain as to which publication it is in,
there is documentation on the Reich Blood Test. They should
be able to tell you which publication, if you contact them directly.

Now as to personal opinions of James DeMeo, everyone is intitled
to their own opinion. Mine is considerably different from Don's. If you
wish to be on DeMeo's good side then do not criticize anything he
does, "ANYTHING". Out of respect for our subscribers, I will not
rant and rave and take him to task, but be assured Jerry and I have
sufficient documentation to prove the point.

The reason that DeMeo and PORE had a falling out was due to a
piece that was critical of his cloudbusting operations being posted
to previous incarnation of the OML (Orgonomy Mailing List) by a
long time critic of his, Joel Carlinsky. After DeMeo had the posting
removed from the list, it was reposted. Each time that DeMeo tried
to censor his critics, the article was reposted. Finally, the OML went
off-line. The OML has been resurrected by PORE and if you wish to
subscribe to it, there is a link on KeelyNet's homepage. What really
aggravated DeMeo is that PORE carried a link to Carlinsky's article
that was posted to the web in a slightly edited version (possibly liableous

language was removed). Where was it posted?... <G> Check the KeelyNet
files list.

Carlinsky's piece pointed out some very real concerns about the improper
use of Reich's cloudbuster technology. While Joel did point a finger at
DeMeo and a few of his associates, the importance of the concerns
raised over environmental damage that could be caused through improper
usage, far out-weighed their petty feud. A cloudbuster's effects range over
hundreds (if not over a thousand) miles,and it is by no means a localized
phenomena.

There is a College of Orgonomy that used to have a site on the Web,
but I'm not sure if they are still around. They had a bi-annual publication
that carried several articles on blood work. Their articles used to be
available
in the PDF format on the Web, now?

Anyway, I hope this information can be of use to you.

Best Regards,

Chuck Henderson
chenders@keelynet.com


----------
> From: donadams <donadams@telusplanet.net>
> To: KeelyNet Discussion List <KeelyNet@DallasTexas.net>
> Subject: Bradley - Orgone
> Date: Wednesday, July 29, 1998 6:59 PM
>
> Hi Bradley, grin...looks like the guys got back to you before I did...
> sorry for the late response and grin, thanks guys for covering me while
> I was away! ;)
>
> Actually those were the sources I would have recommended also!
> James DeMeo is a great guy and very knowledgeable, basically the
> leading current expert in the field as far as I know... Also
> P.O.R.E. is a good resource also. If you can't find theire websites,
> let me know... I should have their URL's around somewhere...
>
> There was a bit of a falling out between DeMeo and P.O.R.E. if I recall
> correctly... I think PORE unfairly criticized some of James work, which
> is simply impeccable to my limited understanding and I think James
> was upset with some of PORE's general practices or methods? I could
> be wrong though.
>
> Jerry mentioned the Orgone motor that used Vaccor tubes... I agree,
> very interesting stuff... seems to indicate some evidence of aether
> medium...but possibly the aspect which governs life force?
>
> I've done a number of my own orgone experiments which I posted on the
> site... if anyone wants me to I could repost? Or you could just look
> them up... not that my experiments were of any great merit, I'm sure
> they weren't but James DeMeo was kind enough to offer some very
> interesting feedback on them and I was quite grateful for the dialogue
> we had...
>
> Hope this helps Bradley! Good luck!
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------
> To leave this list, email <listserver@dallastexas.net>
> with the body text: leave keelynet
> WWW based join and leave forms and KeelyNet list archives
> are at http://dallastexas.net/keelynet/
> -------------------------------------------------------------