Larry
Jerry W. Decker wrote:
>
> Hi Folks!
>
> I'm not sure who wrote this;
> > Jerry, the fact that the North Pole of magnets and compasses on the
> > earth's surface point north, indicates that the north pole is
> > actually giving out "South Pole" magnetic forces.
>
> That is precisely the confusion. The north pole of magnets and
> compasses CAN'T point north because like poles repel, so only a south
> pole would point north...
>
> The north pole 'giving out south pole forces'???? So are you saying its
> easier to just change the age old identification of the north pole
> rather than concede that our pointing devices could be wrong?
>
> Which by the way, THEY ARE NOT...just that the labels on them are
> wrong...it is still a thin magnetized strip having a north and south
> pole...and the south pole seeks the earth north pole.
>
> I'd LIKE to agree with John Berry that its really not important what we
> call them, but it IS important because if we aren't using a consistent
> method of labeling and terms, then everyone would have their own
> 'definition'...<g>...that would be interesting....kind of like the mess
> of confusion in alt sci with cold current, zpe, aether, ether (the
> chemical or the subspace plenum?) for starters.
>
> The fact that one polarity produces specific bio effects which are
> opposite to what the other polarity yields, shows there is a definite
> difference and we have to distinguish clearly between the two poles.
>
> As to the war thing....consider....small bands or tribes of warriors all
> out to kill on an individual basis for equatorial and southern regions
> AS OPPOSED to one crazy leader with hand picked crazies who order
> soldiers to fight in the northern regions.
>
> It is a one man on one man tribe killing basis with the southern region
> AS OPPOSED to the passive group, non warlike mentality, ordered to kill
> by warlike LEADERS and who are afraid to dispute the leaders knowing
> they face court martial or death depending on the political system, in
> the northern regions.
>
> The preceeding paragraph is difficult to write, but I hope it gets my
> point across.
>
> The killing is less overall, I think in the southern regions because it
> has to be done one to one, whereas in the north, technology lets one man
> kill dozens or hundreds with a single projectile or bomb. Therefore,
> there is no argument from me that the northern hemisphere has produced
> far more deaths from war than the south.
>
> HOWEVER, I still think in the northern hemisphere it is the minority of
> soldiers who are out there just for the raw bloodlust that leads to
> killing, rape and pillage by virtue of magnetic polarity influences.
>
> The chickens grown under PURE south pole effects, according to Rawls
> clearly showed that biology recognizes the difference in magnetic polar
> effects, despite all our discussions....the cell will tell..<g>..
>
> One thing Davis/Rawls are quite clear on...the energies do intermix the
> closer the poles are to each other....so although you could have MORE of
> one polarity over another, you don't get the PURE very clear effects
> they got because they used LONG bar and cylinder magnets, with the
> understanding that the greater the distance BETWEEN the poles, the more
> pure the energy would be and the more pronounced would be the effects of
> the specific polar energy being tested.
>
> IMO, in a spherical shape, even a 'slightly oblate spheroid' as the
> earth is, the intermix of polarities won't reliably show the radical
> differences which Davis/Rawls achieved using their widely separated
> poles BECAUSE of this interblending and thus weakening of the specific
> polar effects. Just so.
>
> Of all the craziness that is happening now, I don't see any connection
> with magnetic polarities...some say it is time running down to the
> timewave zero concept (Terence Mckenna)
>
> http://www.resonate.org/places/articles/m_blend/mckenna.htm
>
> "So, for example, when we look at events of the one hundred years
> leading up to the Mayan calendrical termination, we see that the graph
> is topologically similar to the graph that we have said applied to the
> past several thousand years. My interpretation of this is that it means
> that shorter duration subsets of the fractal curve of time are
> microversions of the larger pattern in which they are embedded. Such an
> idea lays the basis for understanding such phenomena as fads, fashion,
> and the occasional wave of historical obsession that characterize
> society. Imagine zeroing in on the point in which the wave passes out of
> the past and into the future. The stupendous idea of an end of time is
> an attempt to negate the eternal stasis, to break the circle. All
> peoples who have awakened to the suffering and hope of the condition
> humaine have arrived at this idea, each in its own way. The other
> peoples who have created a world for themselves have also appointed an
> end to it: Indians, Persians, Greeks, Arabs, and Jews. This final time
> revolutionizes the course of the world."
>
> http://www.trufax.org./twz/twexp.html
>
> "Typically, the time wave (which in reality is a bi-directional,
> tri-layer fractal compression wave) portrays a situation where
> "structure" is created, producing an underlying sub-structure, as it
> were, that becomes less organized until the point where it surfaces and
> undermines the overlying structure, producing novelty and connectedness
> on an instantaneous basis which is temporally recognized as an "event
> horizon" involving a "plunge into novelty." Viewing the timewave, it
> immediately becomes apparent that there are 6 very large plunges into
> novelty between Jan 1, 1996 and Dec 22, 2012 that far outshadow all the
> rest. The first occurs near the end of February 1996 and ends around the
> first week of May 1996, wherein a structure-building (that is
> self-undermining) process begins again."
>
> To download the timewave software for free;
>
> http://serendipity.nofadz.com/ft/ftsw.html
> =====================
> McKenna says time is a single wave which repeats itself as we go
> forward, getting smaller with each repitition but with the same ups and
> downs WITHIN that wave being repeated in each wave repitition until it
> all comes to a stop in 2012 when the Mayan calendar stops...
>
> Personally, I think all the weirdness of late is not only the centennial
> weirdness that is well documented with the arrival each century
> transition but further compounded by this being a MILLENIAL
> transition.....and has NOTHING to do with the magnetic polarities of the
> earth.
>
> Oroblanco wrote;
> > ...Anyway, so much for my opinion - and if anyone disagrees with me
> > I will punch them in the nose! (ha ha - just kidding!)
>
> That was a great closing comment perfectly in line with the topic..<g>..
> --
> Jerry Wayne Decker / jdecker@keelynet.com
> http://keelynet.com / "From an Art to a Science"
> Voice : (214) 324-8741 / FAX : (214) 324-3501
> KeelyNet - PO BOX 870716 - Mesquite - Republic of Texas - 75187
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------
> To leave this list, email <listserver@dallastexas.net>
> with the body text: leave Keelynet
> list archives and on line subscription forms are at
> http://dallastexas.net/keelynet/
> -------------------------------------------------------------