Re: article on electromedicine

Ken Carrigan ( (no email) )
Wed, 7 Apr 1999 09:14:52 -0400

The credence and terminology to of these statements leads
one to believe that maybe the author not involved with this
device or that they are using it amateurly without specific knowledge.

<snip>
>"The field has high voltage, about 20,000 watts, yet

20,000 volts or volts/meter? Watts is a unit of power as in Joules/sec.

>Pulse width;
>
>"We cut electricity into extremely short pulses, less
>than 3 billionths of a second, and the energy is not
>high," said Schoenbach. "There's no heating effects,
>only electrical effects to modify the cell structure."

3 billionths in scientific terms is 333ns, which is really
not that fast, when dealing with pulse widths. I am told
from these guys that the US Navys is slower than thiers,
and that thiers is faster rise time, or pulse. NONSENSE
now... as ours can do 30ns and for our RS105 test.. 10ns
rise times with 75ns fall, and 50kV/m field strengths.

Also the statement that energy is NOT high is false as
they stated 20,000 watts? So what is up with this???

v/r Ken Carrigan
>Only cell internals effected;
>