Brown and Meyer Hybrid/Actual construction beginning

Harvey Norris ( (no email) )
Mon, 22 Feb 1999 15:46:28 PST

At http://dallastexas.net/keelynet/archive/00000903.htm I made an entry
entitled Brown and Meyer Hybrid.

Before this I was quite surprised to recieve an enquire from taiwan
concerning the manufacture of Browns gas electrolisizors. Now I wanted to
get into this business because of the lucrative possibilities. So I secured
the means to produce a first unit according to cost cutting measures.I can
applaud George Wiseman for freely disseminating this technology via a
non-profit corporation but the fact remains that business is just that. So
it is probably good for him or if we are to understand more properly that
the actual worldwide rights to the ER1150 Water Torch are owned by Gobbons
Limited; West Indies as licensed to Fused Heat Ltd. of Calgary AB;Canada
which then can be directed as a reply to them that it is good for them to
have some competition. It will keep them on their toes giving the consumer
the best buy a la Bill Gates. They claim to be the best and for $7800 US
currency I hope it is. At the bottom of the brochure is a clever saying
"Just Ask Our Competition;if you can find any." Where there is a will there
is a way. It is my understanding that this Co uses circular stamped
stainless steel plates also with holes inpregnated for the holding rods
resulting in a great waste of the most expensive component; that of the
T-314 stainless steel used in the 120 plates used in series for this 240
volt industrial model. The first automobile was also expensive and even
though I have been accused of lacking common sense it makes more sense to me
to make a rectangular plate of 6 inches by 6 inches when the manufacturer
supplies these sheets in a 10 feet by 4 feet item. Also by using the best
known weldable plastic material known as high density polyethelene the use
of holding rods can also be circumvented by simply placing grooves on two
sides of the rectangular poly containment vessel which is designed for
actual plate removal and replacement which concievably might become
necessary after years of use. So one should have a model of a file holder
here in ones mind and to also know that each plate might have more tolerance
allowances to fit in place after employing a conventional shearing process
to take this 10 ft by 4 ft stainless sheet and turning it into 160 cut
squares at less than $100.00 cutting cost with virtually no scrap. I wonder
what the comparable stamping cost and waste are? Some people also accuse me
of wondering too much which was the subject of my questioning in the above
archived G Wiseman reply which essentially says that it doesnt matter what
the area of the plates are because the current to the device or
electrolysizor can be limited by placing a cap in series. While that may be
true some of us inquisitive minds would like to know what the maximum
conduction might be without using capacitive limiting so that the least
amount of expensive stainless steel area might be utilized; thereby again
reducing the potential cost to the consumer. Finally to end this post I am
putting these 30 coils in a binary resonant system exactly as noted which
will give me a decided advantage compared to simple capacitive limiting;
where this new method in which a high voltage 700 volt pulse that
immediately diminishes to the smallest voltage enabling conduction to take
place serves to enable a higher dielectric internal charge separation prior
to electrolysis to occur. A rotary arc gap adaptation using two electrodes @
1800 rpm will serve to enable the AC 700 volt pulse to be mechanically
commutated in a interaction of 8 stationary electrodes. The advantage of
mechanical commutation is that the arc gaps enable a high frequency carrier
to be superimposed on the dc voltage burst. Rather then hundreds of pulses
per second this method is theorized to produce thousands. The use of diodes
to rectify this signal will not contain this effect. Also the use of this
mechanical system can determine the pulse duration clipped at the precise
point in the resonant rise of voltage where the capacitance contains the
full storage of charge. This 1800 synchro motor has been ordered today;
hopefully in around two weeks some results of this post can be made. Harvey
D. Norris tesla4@excite.com
PS the method used in this design should make possible the use of a large
parallel plate electrolysizor instead of 60 2 volt cells in series as
Wiseman uses. This in turn may be a cheaper design cost factor. The way the
BRS system acts is to supply the least voltage to enable conduction which
supervents the problem of assembling 60 cells in series from a conventional
voltage source. I have referred to this BRS voltage source as an UNOBVIOUS
voltage potential in the past because the voltage across a load under these
conditions is directly dependendent on its resistance. The disadvantage of
the coil system I am using in this BRS application is that only 6 amps
maximum conduction across electrolysizor can occur which is not a lot of
power input for generating Browns gas. However the expected efficiency is
hoped to be high. I can supply limited amounts of 6 by 6 inch stainless
steel plates (T-314 @ 20 gauge, thicker than Wiseman suggestion) to anyone
wishing to make an electrolysizor designed in a square fashion.)

_______________________________________________________
Get your free, private email at http://mail.excite.com/