Larry
LARRY SULLIVAN wrote:
>
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Your following message has been delivered to the 317 members of
> the list keelynet@DallasTexas.net at 18:12:01 on 16 Feb 1999.
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> I think you guys are talking about the some thing, different termilogy
> but same stuff. Draw a line between the dots!Da!
>
> Larry
>
> Jerry Wayne Decker wrote:
> >
> > Hi Nick et al!
> >
> > Well, Nick, that's kind of true, but Meyer did call it 'fractioning
> > water' as in cracking the water molecule to release the hydrogen and
> > oxygen, which was to be combusted in the engine. Meyer claims to have
> > used a frequency.
> >
> > Whereas Keely claimed that by instantaneously disrupting the molecule,
> > it would produce a tremendous explosion using the 42.8kcps...other
> > frequencies for triple dissociation were 610, 610 and 12kcps.
> >
> > I still find it encouragingly synchronistic and supportive that the
> > late Henry (Andrija) Puharich found that the optimum dissociation
> > frequency for water was 600cps which he happened to stumble upon while
> > looking for a way to remove gases from the blood. When we had him in
> > Dallas, I told him about Keely's research with water dissociation and
> > named those frequencies, he'd never heard that before, so he was
> > surprised also.
> >
> > Keely claimed that using 3 drops of water, exploded in a spherical
> > chamber he produced a pressure of 29,000 psi.
> >
> > As I recall, air pressure at sea level is 14.7 psi. I've worked around
> > 150 psi air pressures and that was enough for me, so like the term
> > billion in money, I have a problem fathoming even 1000 psi.
> >
> > I looked through the about 357 patents at;
> >
> > http://www.uspto.gov (under patent search)
> >
> > and could not locate using meyer+engine+water
> >
> > Just wanted to pull up the details of his claims and technique but
> > guess not today...it goes back to 76 so maybe I missed it.
> >
> > I was thinking he used high voltage AC discharge at one or more
> > frequencies that he claimed cracked the water molecule, but can't
> > prove it without the patent...
> >
> > ---NickandSim@aol.com wrote:
> > >
> > > To Bill,
> > > You are confusing the keely dissociation frequency with
> > the stan
> > > meyer hv water splitter. The keely frequency is the frequency for
> > the
> > > ultrasonic dissociation of water into etheric force (allegedly)
> > > The stan meyer device is a type of electrolytic cell to break down
> > water with
> > > more than %100 efficiency (allegedly)
> > >
> > > Nick Field
> >
> > _________________________________________________________
> > DO YOU YAHOO!?
> > Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
> >
> > -------------------------------------------------------------
> > To leave this list, email <listserver@dallastexas.net>
> > with the body text: leave Keelynet
> > list archives and on line subscription forms are at
> > http://dallastexas.net/keelynet/
> > -------------------------------------------------------------
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------
> To leave this list, email <listserver@dallastexas.net>
> with the body text: leave Keelynet
> list archives and on line subscription forms are at
> http://dallastexas.net/keelynet/
> -------------------------------------------------------------