Re: hydrogen generator

LARRY SULLIVAN ( polymercanada@bc.sympatico.ca )
Tue, 16 Feb 1999 19:07:47 -0800

O.K. Guys:
I said it once before, and I will say it agaim,Sam! It's all how you
look at it, some say toma'to some say to'mato, it's all the same.
You're talking about the same thing that is disassociating molecular
bonds and which is more effiecent.

Larry
LARRY SULLIVAN wrote:
>
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Your following message has been delivered to the 317 members of
> the list keelynet@DallasTexas.net at 18:12:01 on 16 Feb 1999.
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> I think you guys are talking about the some thing, different termilogy
> but same stuff. Draw a line between the dots!Da!
>
> Larry
>
> Jerry Wayne Decker wrote:
> >
> > Hi Nick et al!
> >
> > Well, Nick, that's kind of true, but Meyer did call it 'fractioning
> > water' as in cracking the water molecule to release the hydrogen and
> > oxygen, which was to be combusted in the engine. Meyer claims to have
> > used a frequency.
> >
> > Whereas Keely claimed that by instantaneously disrupting the molecule,
> > it would produce a tremendous explosion using the 42.8kcps...other
> > frequencies for triple dissociation were 610, 610 and 12kcps.
> >
> > I still find it encouragingly synchronistic and supportive that the
> > late Henry (Andrija) Puharich found that the optimum dissociation
> > frequency for water was 600cps which he happened to stumble upon while
> > looking for a way to remove gases from the blood. When we had him in
> > Dallas, I told him about Keely's research with water dissociation and
> > named those frequencies, he'd never heard that before, so he was
> > surprised also.
> >
> > Keely claimed that using 3 drops of water, exploded in a spherical
> > chamber he produced a pressure of 29,000 psi.
> >
> > As I recall, air pressure at sea level is 14.7 psi. I've worked around
> > 150 psi air pressures and that was enough for me, so like the term
> > billion in money, I have a problem fathoming even 1000 psi.
> >
> > I looked through the about 357 patents at;
> >
> > http://www.uspto.gov (under patent search)
> >
> > and could not locate using meyer+engine+water
> >
> > Just wanted to pull up the details of his claims and technique but
> > guess not today...it goes back to 76 so maybe I missed it.
> >
> > I was thinking he used high voltage AC discharge at one or more
> > frequencies that he claimed cracked the water molecule, but can't
> > prove it without the patent...
> >
> > ---NickandSim@aol.com wrote:
> > >
> > > To Bill,
> > > You are confusing the keely dissociation frequency with
> > the stan
> > > meyer hv water splitter. The keely frequency is the frequency for
> > the
> > > ultrasonic dissociation of water into etheric force (allegedly)
> > > The stan meyer device is a type of electrolytic cell to break down
> > water with
> > > more than %100 efficiency (allegedly)
> > >
> > > Nick Field
> >
> > _________________________________________________________
> > DO YOU YAHOO!?
> > Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
> >
> > -------------------------------------------------------------
> > To leave this list, email <listserver@dallastexas.net>
> > with the body text: leave Keelynet
> > list archives and on line subscription forms are at
> > http://dallastexas.net/keelynet/
> > -------------------------------------------------------------
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------
> To leave this list, email <listserver@dallastexas.net>
> with the body text: leave Keelynet
> list archives and on line subscription forms are at
> http://dallastexas.net/keelynet/
> -------------------------------------------------------------