Yea Jerry,
Exactly! Precisely! And they, (Tesla, then Bearden examining Tesla) were so
obviously right on.
Jerry Wayne Decker wrote:
> Hi Dusty, Ken et al!
>
> Hate to bring this up, but that's precisely the point Tom Bearden was
> making several years ago with his 'Final Secret to Free Energy'. That
> potential was the key, not current.
>
> My understanding of it was when energy is evoked in a conductor,
> potential moves from the center radially to the surface....on reaching
> the surface, it does a right angle turn and converts to current.
>
> The trick was to evoke the production of potential and shut it off
> from the power supply before it went perpendicular to produce the
> current which we all know only flows on the surface of conductive
> materials.
>
> The whole thing, as I understand it involves some magical production
> of energy as in current from large volumes of potential.
But not the current, just the potential derived from the voltage pulse. That
can do work. The actual current should not be needed to run a motor.
>
>
> This was to operate like a bucket brigade where the potential was
> evoked, then captured, then dissipated into a load, then the conductor
> was again connected to the power supply for the next packet of
> potential (pure voltage).
>
> Bearden said if you switched the power supply fast enough in and out
> of the load, you could milk out all kinds of free power without
> damaging (as in a battery with chemical corruption of the plates) or
> draining of the power supply.
And doesn't this sound exactly what Tesla was claiming for the source of
power for his car? Pardon me but I think it is staring at us.
>
>
> ---Dusty Rhodes wrote:
> >
> > Hi there Ken, Neighbors,
> >
> > Sounds to me like you hit the nail on the head as far as the voltage
> without the
> > current. That's what he had to be doing to get the resultant 'cold'
> power. Once he
> > choked off the current on one of these extremely fast rising pulses,
> the potential
> > voltage would continue on the external of the conductor of course!
> And the motor
> > doesn't care that current is not actually flowing as long as there
> is a potential
> > difference between the poles in the motor.
> > Power that powers without actually going anywhere. Too cool. And I
> bet that Tesla
> > has been jumping down in his grave trying to get everybody to look.
> >
> > Dusty
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------
--------------42F8E76FB1F16D894F4C50CB
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
<!doctype html public "-//w3c//dtd html 4.0 transitional//en">
Jerry Wayne Decker wrote:
Hi Dusty, Ken et al!But not the current, just the potential derived from the voltage pulse.That can do work. The actual current should not be needed to run a motor.Hate to bring this up, but that's precisely the point Tom Bearden was
making several years ago with his 'Final Secret to Free Energy'. That
potential was the key, not current.My understanding of it was when energy is evoked in a conductor,
potential moves from the center radially to the surface....on reaching
the surface, it does a right angle turn and converts to current.The trick was to evoke the production of potential and shut it off
from the power supply before it went perpendicular to produce the
current which we all know only flows on the surface of conductive
materials.Thewholething,as Iunderstandit involvessomemagicalproduction
of energyas incurrentfromlargevolumesof potential.
And doesn't this sound exactly what Tesla was claiming for the source ofpower for his car? Pardon me but I think it is staring at us.This was to operate like a bucket brigade where the potential was
evoked, then captured, then dissipated into a load, then the conductor
was again connected to the power supply for the next packet of
potential (pure voltage).Beardensaidifyouswitchedthepowersupplyfastenoughinandout
oftheload,youcouldmilkoutallkindsoffreepowerwithout
damaging(asina batterywithchemicalcorruptionoftheplates)or
drainingofthepowersupply.
---Dusty Rhodes wrote:
>
> Hi there Ken, Neighbors,
>
> Sounds to me like you hit the nail on the head as far as the voltage
without the
> current. That's what he had to be doing to get the resultant 'cold'
power. Once he
> choked off the current on one of these extremely fast rising pulses,
the potential
> voltage would continue on the external of the conductor of course!
And the motor
> doesn't care that current is not actually flowing as long as there
is a potential
> difference between the poles in the motor.
> Power that powers without actually going anywhere. Too cool. AndI
bet that Tesla
> has been jumping down in his grave trying to get everybody to look.
>
> Dusty-------------------------------------------------------------
--------------42F8E76FB1F16D894F4C50CB--