I am becoming very frustrated by the tantalising reports and half
>baked explanations but no repeatable experiments. It is important ot
>remember that the main distinguishing feature of an inventor is
paranoia that
>someone is trying to steal his ideas for comercial gain.
Maybe, but if the inventor has a wife and kids he needs to make some
money off his inventions, which means he can't just give them away over
the internet. I could post ideas on this list at the rate of about one a
day. You guys could be building my very specific designs forever,
assuming you wanted to.
Why don't I post all of these amazing designs?
1) Most of them won't work, and I don't know which ones :-)
2) I would like to make SOME money off of ONE of them so I can quit my
boring job and be a true blue inventor.
3) You guys would get sick of me real fast.
True though this may
>be, if those ideas are spread so wide that it is impossible to erase
them it
>will help the whole of mankind to reach a better and cleaner standard
of
>living.
I plan on full internet exposure on some congenial websites-- when I get
something that works that isn't a lab queen, and AFTER I have paid some
bills.
>The most convincing device I have found so far is the hyde device that
uses
>the tripple disk system. Would it be possible for someone eles to
replicate
>one of the early, simple, version so that the rest of us could see that
the
>principle works? The inventor could even water down the design to make
it
>just self running and no more so that he did not have to release so
much
>'secret' info.
>
There is quite a bit of history around the Hyde disc. I don't have my
references handy here, but it seems to me that
1) Nobody could get it to work but Hyde, and for all sorts of good
reasons why. Moray King and Don Kelly are the replicators that come to
mind. Kelly did almost exactly what you describe.
2) Hyde wanted an incredibly large amount of money before he would part
with his invention. Not in itself a crime. But to not give it to him is
not a crime either. In addition I think it was the view of King that
there must either be something missing from the patent (quite likely) or
it didn't work.
Not to say that I think the E/S generator designs are unpromising. But
to me the useful thing is the connection between electric charge and a
sort of aetheric or orgone particle that has the interesting property
that it attracts itself.
Basically the properties that lead to electrical energy growth in these
systems are:
electrons repel electrons, so energy is stored when they are close
together.
there is a mutual attraction between aether particles and electrons.
aether particles are electrically neutral, but are generated in
electrical activity.
Folllowing from this, if an enclosed space is created that is lightly
electrically charged, and a source of aetheric particles, like a
crystal, is placed within this space, the electrical charge will grow,
as aetheric particles allow electrons to move into closer positions than
they would otherwise.
These effects can be amplified and controlled with pyramids and orgone
accumulators (but, watch your watch :-) The crystal can be excited by
special coil arrangements.
Gallimore shows this effect in the experiment where he changed the
discharge cycle of a capacitor exposed to a quartz crystal. If you
change the capacitance of a charged body you have changed the amount of
energy stored within it.
Fred