I have been doing something for the last couple years now.
I think the reason we don't see anything is that it is not so
simple a thing to get an overunity system. As one on the list
said, it is expensive and time consuming. I am more than
willing to share information. I have been corresponding with
Jean-Louis Naudin for awhile. He seems to be the only one
doing any really visible research along with Stefan Hartmann
and a few others. Tom Bearden is doing research all the time
but is not revealing anything because of the need to protect
his patent position.
If you look at the Naudin web site you will see the results of
alot of research. Most of it doesn't pan out. The only thing
close lately is the nearly 100% self powering of his Newman
machine.
On the Keelynet I see alot of claims being thrown around and
alot of theorizing by quite a few who haven't done their homework
and don't understand some basic concepts. I don't even bother
to respond to those and I am sure alot of others just watch and
wait for something that really works. I don't want to spend time
on this net explaining and teaching basic theory to those who
haven't really been diligent in getting the facts. As Jerry Decker says after
30 years of watching there isn't anything that really works yet.
Some, I am sure,
don't say anything because Jerry has said to
don't bother posting anything unless you can prove it first.
The best proof is a self power system running in a closed loop
mode. Measurements can be faked or done improperly or just
misinterpreted. Calibration could be off. This is why a self-powered
self-feedback mode for an OU system can't be argued with.
I have been an EE for over 25 years and started with a Tesla coil
in jr high. These days I have little patience with things that don't
work and are poorly engineered. So I can understand Jerry's attitude.
Enough of my ranting on this subject.
What I am doing now................
I am building a different design of Newman machine to test some
theories. I think something else is going on that Newman doesn't
understand. He might be right, but I don't think so. I might be right
or wrong. It is all theory until you have proof and understand it and
can reliably repeat a phenomenon. So on to experimentation.
I have distilled down all the claimed OU devices to what appears
to be the central phenomenon causing common effects.
This is PCR or phase conjugate retroreflection. This is a proven
phenomenon in optics. A negative time field is responsible for
a reversal of normal effects. Scattering of energy becomes collection
that results in cooling. If more energy is demanded it is supplied
rather than depleted. In optics a wave will repair itself if distorted or
interrupted. The fiberfuse effect is probably a result of PCR.
It seems that it might be possible to induce PCR with a system of
electrons in a conductor. The question is how. I think some of this
to a very limited degree is happening in a Newman machine and is
responsible for the mild cooling effect. PCR in optics necessarily
has to be interacting with electrons in atomic orbitals. So why
shouldn't it be possible in an electronic or electromagnetic system.
It is all related to quantum physics. Everything is.
This is what I plan to test for in my Newman machine design.
Anyway, there is my 2 cents worth. So somebody who is in the know
give me some feedback on my PCR theory.
Regards and Happy New Year to all,
Dave Squires