Re: Virtual Sandtable and the mysterious "quack"?

Alan Schneider ( alansch@zip.com.au )
Wed, 20 May 1998 09:07:04 GMT

On Wed, 20 May 1998 00:48:13 -0700 (PDT), Hexslinger
<hexslngr@internet-frontier.net> wrote:

>> Trust me, I have limited knowledge of COBOL and C. The most advanced
>> things I did in C were pointers and some arrays!

>You wouldn't need much knowledge beyond that. (COBOL is evil, BTW). :)

Actually COBOL itself is not evil, just the concept behind it.
Imagine the letdown all those managerial types would have
copped when they found they _still_ couldn't write their own
programs and had to hire programmers to do it for them <Big Grin>.

The language itself does have a certain style to it, it's just
so verbose! (And so abysmally unsuited for scientific applications,
that's why they had to develop FORTRAN as well <smirk>.) The chief
occupational hazard of early COBOL programmers was writers cramp
from filling out all those coding forms, neatly enough that the
card punch operators could read them <Grin>.

Cheers all,
Alan