Jerry W. Decker wrote:
> Hi Folks!
>
> This was in response to an email about suppression...
> ------------------------
> Well, despite all the claims, I don't think there is much to most of
> these 'death threat' claims....such claims pop up when the inventor
> fails to produce or is otherwise required to prove the claim....usually
> propagated by the inventor, his followers or investors.
>
> I have known several people who don't work, living off handouts or from
> others who kindly allow them to live or use their property....these guys
> are so devoted to their particular invention, they just lose all touch
> with the realities and necessities of sustaining their own needs.
>
> If they get into problems with taxes, creditors, the law or otherwise,
> they use it as justification of harassment. IMHO, they create their own
> hell and try to blame others, a common thing nowadays.
>
> I fully expect an entire cult will spring up around Meyers death, it's
> already started in the conspiracy circles.
>
> As to Sweet, I never met the man, but I've known Tom Bearden for many
> years, have met and talked with Walter Rosenthal and know Don Watson
> very well, so they have been my main sources of information since they
> worked with Sweet while he was living.
>
> To tell you the truth, there probably are a few crazies out there who
> would make threats which could easily and falsely attributed to
> government or big business.
>
> However, I think perhaps one in 200 claims of suppression might have
> some organized basis. Most of these guys are so flaky, they don't have
> sufficient credibility to be worthy of note by any 'organized' group.
>
> I know for a fact that the conferences are in fact monitored by at least
> one government agency, because I was approached by the DIA to work for
> them (two of them, one whose name was Thompson at a Global Sciences
> Congress about 1988).
>
> This all happened when a group of about 9 of us were sitting at this
> very big conference table and I was rattling off about something. David
> Fasold had gone out of the room to get a beer and on returning, two men
> were with him, white shirts, slacks, tie, baldheaded, one with glasses.
> I thought they were friends of David (he is the fellow who found what
> many of us believe to be Noah's Ark, well the bibical one as there were
> apparently several arks from different cultures).
>
> So these two guys sat near my end of the table and listened for a few
> minutes, then this Thompson guy started asking questions about scalars
> and general weirdness, to which I responded and said something about
> quartz switches...he then told me about a Prof. Nunnelly at UTD who had
> developed a quartz switching device that would put out tens of thousands
> of simultaenous frequencies (like a spark gap transmitter) and with some
> power.
>
> He said Nunnelly, with one stroke, had completely obviated the entire
> Stealth project (radar absorptive paint) and that he and his co-agent
> were coming to Dallas to meet with Dr. Nunnelly and if I was interested
> would be invited to join them. So we talked about that and other techie
> things for awhile and the rest of the group seemed a bit lost.
>
> Finally, he said how would I like to work for the DIA, I said I didn't
> know what DIA stood for, he said Defense Intelligence Agency. I said
> you have got to be kidding, he said no, he and his partner were there to
> check out this particular alternative science conference, to see if
> there was anything the government should know about.
>
> He said it was rare to find anyone with any science comprehension at
> such affairs and the DIA and other government agencies were always on
> the lookout for people who could bridge metaphysical/alternative science
> with formal science. He said there was also another couple of fellows
> at this conference from the Navy intelligence group, but I don't recall
> the name of the Navy agencies he gave.
>
> I asked what would I be expected to do and he said, read, study, attend
> conferences at government expense and report back to them in as much
> detail, correlated with and IN known orthodox science terms so that
> others could get a handle on what was being worked on or claimed.
>
> It was quite incredible and made a lasting impression on me...however, I
> laughed and declined as I knew that anything that I might learn, I would
> never be allowed to talk about or get involved in because of the nature
> of the job.
>
> So, I know these alternative science conferences are at least monitored
> and it follows that any inventor with some degree of credibility (a
> working device or working from a theory to build such a device) would
> probably be at least watched.
>
> Some of us joked about one of these agenices knocking of a good majority
> of 'players' by going to these conferences and mind-controlling the
> bunch, or some other weirdness like bio-weapons, etc.. Like lambs to
> slaughter and we come on our own...<g>...
>
> Anyway, in my case, I've never experienced the least bit of threat or
> innuendo, except from the unavoidable crazies who infest all aspects of
> life.
>
> The sooner all these inventors realize that the best protection is full
> and free disclosure to as many people as you can, and copyright the
> document so your name is associated with it wherever it goes, the sooner
> we'll have working devices. This copyright, shareware approach will
> bring the inventor all kinds of acclaim and I think, opportunities.
> --
> Jerry W. Decker / jdecker@keelynet.com
> http://keelynet.com / "From an Art to a Science"
> Voice : (214) 324-8741 / FAX : (214) 324-3501
> KeelyNet - PO BOX 870716 - Mesquite - Republic of Texas - 75187