Ray Tomes wrote:
> Hi all, I am new here. My name is Ray Tomes and I have been in touch
> with Jerry by email for about a year and still looking forward to
> meeting him some time. I live in New Zealand and do full time research
> on cycles and the formula for the universe.
>
> On Fri, 27 Mar 1998, Norman Wootan <normw@fastlane.net> wrote:
>
> >Hi! Jerry et all; I wish to thank you for the great answer regarding the
> >MRA project. ...
>
> Norman, I was really interested and moved to read your post and Jerry's
> earlier statement. When the MRA stuff was happening originally I was
> pleased that Bill Beaty sent stuff to usenet so that I found out about
> it. Through him I managed to get some information to you guys and was
> pleased that it was appreciated at the time.
>
> Then and now, I think that I have some information derived from my
> theories that is essential in understanding almost all anomalous device
> behaviour. Of all the strange devices and rigorous anomalous data that
> I know about every one fits with my theory.
>
> Rather than try and post the whole theory here I will just put the URLs
> Ray Tomes home page - http://www.kcbbs.gen.nz/users/rtomes/rt-home.htm
> Harmonics theory - http://www.kcbbs.gen.nz/users/rtomes/st201.htm
> and those that are interested can have a look. However I will include
> one table and a brief explanation here also.
>
> The harmonics theory is a fundamental theory about the universe which is
> derived from the fact that the wave behaviour of the universe is
> non-linear (this is in fact a General Relativity result). In essence it
> says that every standing wave will gradually lose energy to other waves
> that are exact harmonics of the original wave. I believe that all major
> structures in the universe are nothing other than many levels of
> superimposed standing waves. The rate of energy movement is extremely
> low, at about the Hubble rate of 1 part in 10 billion per year.
>
> >From the above simple axiom I can calculate that some waves have more
> energy than others because there are more paths to them. For example, a
> wave of frequency 12 receives energy from frequency 1 by 8 different
> routes while 11 and 13 have only one route each. Harmonics 12, 288,
> 2880 and especially 34560 are calculated to very strong. Near powers of
> 34560 are also especially strong waves. Let us look at that in relation
> to an assumed universal wave of 10 billion light years.
>
> N 10^28 cm Feature Common Units Observed
> / 34560^N
>
> 0 1*10^28 cm Universe 10^10 light years ~10^10 LY
> 1 2.9*10^23 cm Galaxies 3*10^5 light years 2.2e6, 1.8e5
> 2 8.4*10^18 cm Stars 8.9 light years 4.43, 8.9 au + etc
> 3 2.4*10^14 cm Planets 16 a. u. 10, 0.35 au
> 4 7.0*10^9 cm Moons 70,000 km 190,000 km + others
> 5 2.0*10^5 cm X 2 km ? 1.7 km ?
> 6 5.9 cm Y 5.9 cm ? 5 cm ?
> 7 1.7*10^-4 cm Z (Cells) 1.7 microns ~1.5 microns
> 8 4.9*10^-9 cm Atoms 0.49 Angstrom 0.53 Angstrom
> 9 1.4*10^-13 cm Nucleons 1.4 fm 1.3 fm
> 10 4.0*10^-18 cm Quarks 4*10^-18 cm ? but < 10*10^-18 cm
>
> The predicted major structural distance scales in the universe match the
> observations of distances between galaxies, stars, planets, moons, ...
> atoms and Nucleons. The predictions for atom and nucleon waves are very
> near to the observed Bohr radius and nucleon radius.
>
> Note that the above is a gross oversimplification of the theory and that
> there are other less important l;evels of structure in between. There
> are also many different frequencies present and the strong ones are
> musically related. I have been able to explain many previously weird
> results related to cycles in economics, geology, physics, cosmology and
> so on. The theory is well tested and really works. That does not mean
> that everything is known, but the guess work can be considerably
> narrowed down.
>
> Look at the levels that I call X, Y and Z which are the ones that have
> no obvious structures visible. Each of these is associated with some
> anomalous devices.
>
> X is associated with the MRA results. From the posted frequencies that
> had interesting things happen with the MRA device I found that all were
> very near exact fractions of 172,500 Hz. That frequency corresponds to
> a 1.74 km wave which fits close to my X prediction.
>
> Y is associated with an anomalous chemistry result that I heard about in
> Russia which gets a different result when the radius of a flask is near
> 5 cm. Note that 1.74 km / 5 cm is very close to 34560 (certainly within
> the errors of the 5 cm figure).
>
> Z is associated with the phenomenon called "electron clustering" which
> shows quanta of near 1 um. There are other things that also show that
> about 1.5 um is a key quantum size.
>
> I want to stress that I am quite certain that the following aspects of
> these experiments are important...
>
> 1. The frequencies, wavelengths, periods etc of all oscillations MUST
> match natural waves that are present everywhere in the universe if you
> want to tap natural energies (free energy).
>
> 2. The dimensions of all important components must be sizes that match
> important wavelengths of natural waves.
>
> 3. The substances used (liquids, gases and solids) must have speeds of
> waves; light, sound and heat; that allow these matches to take place. I
> might add that the three major types of waveforms mentioned are also
> related by the 34560 ratio in velocity.
>
> Because most experimenters are not aware of these factors (except
> perhaps some who study Keely to some extent) they do not understand why
> experiments have a partial result one time, nothing the next, and blow
> up on still another occasion. Even things like liquid levels in
> containers and temperatures will affect these conditions.
>
> Many experiments are like a radio turned up to full volume but off the
> station. You get a bit of crackling and sometimes a faint signal and
> then one day the tuning accidentally wanders onto the station (the
> natural waves) and all hell breaks loose.
>
> Does this make sense?
>
> I am pleased to assist anyone working on experiments if they give me
> information about the frequencies, sizes, materials etc that they use.
> Remember also that the waves in the universe are modulated and some
> frequencies come and go over longer periods. Even the rate of decay of
> unstable isotopes show periodicities (subtle but there).
>
> -- Ray Tomes -- http://www.kcbbs.gen.nz/users/rtomes/rt-home.htm
> Cycles email list -- http://www.kcbbs.gen.nz/users/af/cyc.htm
> Boundaries of Science http://www.kcbbs.gen.nz/users/af/scienceb.htm