Re: Gold

Billy M. Williams ( (no email) )
Sat, 14 Mar 1998 20:49:19 -0500

Yah thats the research I was refering to, at Princeton University. They are
doing serious research on those types of non-random effects.
I saw something awhile back tho that amazed me.
You take a visible red laser and shoot it across the room onto a white
background. Then place a vertical clamp halfway between the laser and the
target. The clamp is on each side of the beam and can be adjusted inwards
toward the beam. As the clamp is closed the beam of course goes from a
perfect circle to a vertical shape. The strange part is once it cuts off
almost all of the beam the vertical shape begins to flatten out and goes
totally horizontal in shape till the clamp closes off all the light. This
effect really took some Quantum researchers by suprise.
Me too. Strangest light effect I've seen yet.
Billy M. Williams

--------------------------------------------------------------------------
He spoke with the wisdom that can only come from experience, like a
guy who went blind because he looked at a solar eclipse without one of
those boxes with a pinhole in it and now goes around the country
speaking at high schools about the dangers of looking at a solar
eclipse without one of those boxes with a pinhole in it.

----------
> From: Jerry W. Decker <jdecker@keelynet.com>
> To: KeelyNet-L@lists.kz
> Subject: Re: Gold
> Date: Saturday, March 14, 1998 9:22 PM
>
> Hi Billy et al!
>
> You wrote;
> > Tho when a person watches and mentally tries to make it come up heads
> > or tails more, the odds get very very screwy. There is no way to
> > effect the odds of the test other than on a mental level.
>
> A year or so ago, a study was done with baby chickens placed in a room
> with a robot that was simply a motor with microswitches so that if ran
> into anything, it would back up a few inches, rotate about 45 to 90
> degrees and drive forward.
>
> The path of this robot was monitored as it moved all by itself in a room
> and found to be completely random.
>
> When baby chicks were placed in the room in a small pen, the robot had a
> decided tendency to 'hang around' the chicks. I never saw the complete
> report on this experiment but it was something on the order of 70-80% of
> the robots travels would bring it as close to the chick pen as possible.
>
> Amazed the researchers and led them to thinking that inanimate objects
> are attracted for some reason to animate objects....there were other
> experiment done that gave similar weighted results when living bodies
> were introduced as opposed to non-living...
>
> I just thought your mention of the randomness studies was intriguing. I
> have two reports sent to me by a lady scientist friend at Princeton who
> is heavily involved in such research and the anomalies definitely
> indicate something strange is going on. Eventually they'll get it to
> techniques that people can learn so they can use the effect for
> themselves.
> --
> Jerry W. Decker / jdecker@keelynet.com
> http://keelynet.com / "From an Art to a Science"
> Voice : (214) 324-8741 / FAX : (214) 324-3501
> KeelyNet - PO BOX 870716 - Mesquite - Republic of Texas - 75187