At 09:51 PM 2/11/98 -0500, you wrote:
>Jay,
>
>>Hi, what's your opinion about Professor Searl's premise that magnetic
>>fields (from stationary magnets, if anything is stationary... ) ARE
>>dynamic? Maybe I misunderstand, but that's what I thought he was
>>saying, and was a fundamental principle in his inventions, which, of
>>course, I have never seen.
>
>Searl's device, as I recall it, rotates cylindrical magnets around the
>outside
>of another cylindrical magnet. Wheather both are pinwheel type magnets
>and made of differing material.... who can guess... However, they DO
>rotate and hense.... DYNAMIC!
>
>Magnetics have a static magnetic field - they do not induce current in
>any metal unless the flux cycles or oscillates.
>v/r Ken Carrigan
>
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------
|| Come ride The River ------- http://www.theriver.com/ ||
------------------------------------------------------------