>Hi, what's your opinion about Professor Searl's premise that magnetic
>fields (from stationary magnets, if anything is stationary... ) ARE
>dynamic? Maybe I misunderstand, but that's what I thought he was
>saying, and was a fundamental principle in his inventions, which, of
>course, I have never seen.
Searl's device, as I recall it, rotates cylindrical magnets around the
outside
of another cylindrical magnet. Wheather both are pinwheel type magnets
and made of differing material.... who can guess... However, they DO
rotate and hense.... DYNAMIC!
Magnetics have a static magnetic field - they do not induce current in
any metal unless the flux cycles or oscillates.
v/r Ken Carrigan