Perreault writes:
Then you are just as brain-washed as most people are!
My process uses a clean nuclear process, meaning that
it does not generate neutrons when properly constructed.
>
> Overunity is one of the reasons I'm here, what the list was created for
> and what I'm hoping people can comprehend as one of three basic
> goals....all of which are clearly posted and which everyone is expected
> to have read prior to subscribing and to comply with.
Perreault writes:
"Over-unity" can not be achieved without a source of energy!
>
> I too subscribe to freenrg-l and vortex-l and find little of use to me
> there, though perhaps one in 30-50 posts has something interesting.
>
> Thus the creation of this list, without the arguments, the infinite
> crossposting from people who are not even on the list, the niggling about
> micro electrochemical effects, ad nauseum.
>
> Jerry had written;
> _> the inventor will be the FINAL ARBITER
> _>of how his/her device will be promoted, sold, whatever.
Perreault writes:
So, you are censoring FREE SPEACH?
This is "ad nauseum."
>
> Alan wrote;
> > Preeeeeecisely!
> > Therefore, it behooves us to discuss at least some of the pitfalls
> > of the various approaches on this list so that if one of us does
> > happen to stumble into a viable approach we will have some idea of
> > how *not* to go about marketing it.
Jerry wrote:
>
> So I am puzzled how you can recognize that the inventor will be the
> arbiter of how the device will be marketed, yet you continue with the
> idea that someone who'd developed such marvelous technology would give a
> flip about what any of us would say.
Perreault writes:
It is obvious what you think of me Jerry,
so you can UNSUBSCRIBE me and through me
into the trash with the rest of your garbage...
>
> We probably did not play a part in it financially or technology-wise
> because we are too busy discussing how to market CLAIMS, rather than
> figuring out a working device.
Perreault writes:
You mean chasing some magical energy that is in the land of OZ...
Excuse me, the land of ZPE...
>
> Again, if we continually argue or discuss non technology, then the device
> will never be built, so the discussion is useless. Much like a time
> paradox.
Perreault writes:
The fact is that a device HAS BEEN BUILT!
-ISIS